東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Expanding our Understanding of Const...

Newton, Daniel.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice: Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice: Accounting for Voice Function and Scope./
Author:	Newton, Daniel.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	198 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
Subject:	Management. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10809268
ISBN:	9780355931747

Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice: Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.
Newton, Daniel.

Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice: Accounting for Voice Function and Scope. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 198 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.

Constructive voice, the sharing of ideas or concerns that improve organizational functioning, is an important workplace behavior. Recent narrative reviews of constructive voice have highlighted the importance of accounting for different types of voice. Initial efforts to explain the type of constructive voice have focused on voice function, and distinguished constructive voice as promotive or prohibitive in nature. Yet, research findings regarding relationships between promotive and prohibitive voice and antecedents of constructive voice reveal inconsistencies that suggest that our theoretical understanding is incomplete. In this dissertation, I argue that in addition to distinguishing constructive voice as to its function (i.e., promotive voice and prohibitive voice), it is also important to distinguish constructive voice as to its scope (i.e., the number of different issues expressed by employees). By accounting for the function and scope of voice, I develop four specific types of constructive voice (i.e., championing, initiating, alarming, and patrolling) and conduct two studies wherein I establish construct validity and test differences in antecedent and outcome relationships with the specific types of voice. I first focus on scale development: generating items and assessing content validity. In Study 1, I test the factor structure of championing, initiating, alarming, and patrolling, and the nomological network of the measures. My second study is a field study of 251 employees in an insurance company and manufacturing facility. In Study 2 I test the criterion-related validity of the measures and explore the implications of voice scope. The research reported in my dissertation contributes to our understanding of constructive voice, and following from this, facilitates further theoretical and practical advances as to when employees who voice may be heard and when they may be tuned out.

ISBN: 9780355931747Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice: Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.
LDR:02905nmm a2200313 4500 001 2163726
005 20181022132748.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355931747
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10809268
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:17847
035 $a AAI10809268
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Newton, Daniel. $3 3351752
245 1 0 $a Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice: Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 198 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jeffery A. LePine.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.
520 $a Constructive voice, the sharing of ideas or concerns that improve organizational functioning, is an important workplace behavior. Recent narrative reviews of constructive voice have highlighted the importance of accounting for different types of voice. Initial efforts to explain the type of constructive voice have focused on voice function, and distinguished constructive voice as promotive or prohibitive in nature. Yet, research findings regarding relationships between promotive and prohibitive voice and antecedents of constructive voice reveal inconsistencies that suggest that our theoretical understanding is incomplete. In this dissertation, I argue that in addition to distinguishing constructive voice as to its function (i.e., promotive voice and prohibitive voice), it is also important to distinguish constructive voice as to its scope (i.e., the number of different issues expressed by employees). By accounting for the function and scope of voice, I develop four specific types of constructive voice (i.e., championing, initiating, alarming, and patrolling) and conduct two studies wherein I establish construct validity and test differences in antecedent and outcome relationships with the specific types of voice. I first focus on scale development: generating items and assessing content validity. In Study 1, I test the factor structure of championing, initiating, alarming, and patrolling, and the nomological network of the measures. My second study is a field study of 251 employees in an insurance company and manufacturing facility. In Study 2 I test the criterion-related validity of the measures and explore the implications of voice scope. The research reported in my dissertation contributes to our understanding of constructive voice, and following from this, facilitates further theoretical and practical advances as to when employees who voice may be heard and when they may be tuned out.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0624
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Business Administration. $3 1679662
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10809268