東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The University of California's Use o...

Heller, Kevin William.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The University of California's Use of the iNACOL Standards for Online Classes.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The University of California's Use of the iNACOL Standards for Online Classes./
Author:	Heller, Kevin William.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:	177 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-08A(E).
Subject:	Education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10637530
ISBN:	9780355763584

The University of California's Use of the iNACOL Standards for Online Classes.
Heller, Kevin William.

The University of California's Use of the iNACOL Standards for Online Classes. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 177 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2017.

The iNACOL standards for online courses are widely used by educational institutions across the world, including the University of California, which uses them in its formula for granting or denying a-g approval for online classes. To date, however, there has been little research into the quality of the iNACOL standards. Although the developers of the 52 iNACOL standards never prioritized one standard over another, UC has independently determined that 15 of the standards are more important than the remaining 37. This study asked online teachers to rank the 52 iNACOL standards, and results were compared to UC's prioritized list. Results were mixed. Overall, teachers were more likely to endorse UC's 15 "power standards" as being among the most important within different instructional domains than they were to endorse the 37 non-power standards. However, that pattern did not always hold true when each domain was considered separately. Additionally, there were a number of instances of online teachers selecting non-power standards as being more important than power standards. Recommendations for policy improvements appear in the conclusion, based upon the quantitative and qualitative results.

ISBN: 9780355763584Subjects--Topical Terms:

516579
Education.

The University of California's Use of the iNACOL Standards for Online Classes.
LDR:02188nmm a2200313 4500 001 2161826
005 20181002081324.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355763584
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10637530
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucdavis:17436
035 $a AAI10637530
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Heller, Kevin William. $3 3349791
245 1 4 $a The University of California's Use of the iNACOL Standards for Online Classes.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 177 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Cassandra M.D. Hart.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2017.
520 $a The iNACOL standards for online courses are widely used by educational institutions across the world, including the University of California, which uses them in its formula for granting or denying a-g approval for online classes. To date, however, there has been little research into the quality of the iNACOL standards. Although the developers of the 52 iNACOL standards never prioritized one standard over another, UC has independently determined that 15 of the standards are more important than the remaining 37. This study asked online teachers to rank the 52 iNACOL standards, and results were compared to UC's prioritized list. Results were mixed. Overall, teachers were more likely to endorse UC's 15 "power standards" as being among the most important within different instructional domains than they were to endorse the 37 non-power standards. However, that pattern did not always hold true when each domain was considered separately. Additionally, there were a number of instances of online teachers selecting non-power standards as being more important than power standards. Recommendations for policy improvements appear in the conclusion, based upon the quantitative and qualitative results.
590 $a School code: 0029.
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a University of California, Davis. $b Education. $3 1037322
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-08A(E).
790 $a 0029
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10637530