東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Consumer Perceptions of Food Safety ...

Britwum, Kofi.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Consumer Perceptions of Food Safety and Preferences for Food Safety Interventions.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Consumer Perceptions of Food Safety and Preferences for Food Safety Interventions./
Author:	Britwum, Kofi.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:	141 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-12A(E).
Subject:	Agricultural economics. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10600973
ISBN:	9780355103144

Consumer Perceptions of Food Safety and Preferences for Food Safety Interventions.
Britwum, Kofi.

Consumer Perceptions of Food Safety and Preferences for Food Safety Interventions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 141 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2017.

This dissertation consists of three essays that investigate consumers' response to technologies that mitigate food safety risks: cattle vaccines against E. coli and direct-fed microbials.

ISBN: 9780355103144Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172150
Agricultural economics.

Consumer Perceptions of Food Safety and Preferences for Food Safety Interventions.
LDR:03433nmm a2200361 4500 001 2160970
005 20180803131930.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355103144
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10600973
035 $a (MiAaPQ)unl:12723
035 $a AAI10600973
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Britwum, Kofi. $3 3348903
245 1 0 $a Consumer Perceptions of Food Safety and Preferences for Food Safety Interventions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Amalia Yiannaka.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2017.
520 $a This dissertation consists of three essays that investigate consumers' response to technologies that mitigate food safety risks: cattle vaccines against E. coli and direct-fed microbials.
520 $a The first essay examines the influence of information framing and issue involvement on perceptions of the two food safety technologies. This essay also examines the role of issue involvement on food safety perceptions. A hypothetical survey which includes six information treatments was developed, and targeted a representative, random sample of U.S consumers. Participants were exposed to general information about E. coli and the two food safety technologies, a gain-framed message, a loss-framed message, a media story to elicit issue involvement, or combinations of the media story and the gain-framed or loss-framed messages. Empirical findings show that issue involvement has an impact on perceptions of E. coli foodborne infections. Both loss-framed and gain-framed messages were persuasive in shaping perceptions of vaccines against E. coli, and direct-fed microbials.
520 $a The second essay determines consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for beef products from cattle treated with the two interventions, and examines the persuasive impacts of information framing and issue involvement on WTP for the two technologies. The hypothetical survey previously described also included a choice experiment to achieve the WTP objective of this essay. Results reveal that consumers preferred cattle vaccines as an attribute in ground beef to direct-fed microbials. The highest WTP for ground beef produced with these interventions was recorded among participants who received the loss-framed message, and the loss-framed message and the media story.
520 $a The third essay identified ways of communicating food safety interventions using different labeling cues. A survey which targeted beef consumers in the state of Nebraska was developed, and asked participants to choose between ground beef with the standard label, and one that in addition to the standard label had a food safety label. Findings show that consumers are likely to choose a food label that makes positive but unsubstantiated claims of food safety than labels that support food safety claims.
520 $a Overall, study findings indicate a market potential for food safety attributes, and suggest a tactful description of these attributes on food labels.
590 $a School code: 0138.
650 4 $a Agricultural economics. $3 3172150
650 4 $a Economics. $3 517137
650 4 $a Marketing. $3 536353
690 $a 0503
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0338
710 2 $a The University of Nebraska - Lincoln. $b Agricultural Economics. $3 1676858
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-12A(E).
790 $a 0138
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10600973