東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Testing a Model of Organizational Tr...

Fredotovic, Ivana.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Testing a Model of Organizational Transparency in Higher Education through Faculty Perceptions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Testing a Model of Organizational Transparency in Higher Education through Faculty Perceptions./
作者:	Fredotovic, Ivana.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	131 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-10A(E).
標題:	Educational leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10811369
ISBN:	9780438038332

Testing a Model of Organizational Transparency in Higher Education through Faculty Perceptions.
Fredotovic, Ivana.

Testing a Model of Organizational Transparency in Higher Education through Faculty Perceptions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 131 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Barry University, 2018.

Transparency is described as a multifaceted construct with three qualities (i.e., information disclosure, participation, and accountability) relating to trust, communication, and ethics. Expectations for organizational transparency in higher education have grown in the past two decades. Yet, there have been few studies that investigate this concept in higher education. Using exploratory factor analyses and t-tests for independent samples, this study (a) examined the degree to which the model of organizational transparency proposed by Rawlins (2008) and tested in healthcare, is consistent in higher education and across different types institutions (i.e., public vs. private), (b) developed a scoring key and instructions for Rawlins' transparency instrument, which adds pragmatic value to the instrument, and (c) compared full-time faculty perceptions of organizational transparency in the two types of institutions. The results from 407 faculty responses revealed that (a) derived latent constructs in higher education were aligned with those identified in the original setting, (b) inter-item agreement differences were identified across factors, and (c) faculty in private institutions reported higher overall transparency scores than faculty in public institutions, although the effect size was small. The study results extend the body of knowledge related to organizational transparency in a new setting and the stakeholder literature by empirically measuring faculty perceptions of organizational transparency in higher education. In addition, the development of the scoring key may be valuable for administrators and leaders attempting to identify institutional strengths and weaknesses relevant to their transparency efforts and reputation.

ISBN: 9780438038332Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.

Testing a Model of Organizational Transparency in Higher Education through Faculty Perceptions.
LDR:02716nmm a2200301 4500 001 2160321
005 20180724121430.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438038332
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10811369
035 $a (MiAaPQ)barry:10124
035 $a AAI10811369
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fredotovic, Ivana. $3 3348241
245 1 0 $a Testing a Model of Organizational Transparency in Higher Education through Faculty Perceptions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 131 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Carmen L. McCrink.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Barry University, 2018.
520 $a Transparency is described as a multifaceted construct with three qualities (i.e., information disclosure, participation, and accountability) relating to trust, communication, and ethics. Expectations for organizational transparency in higher education have grown in the past two decades. Yet, there have been few studies that investigate this concept in higher education. Using exploratory factor analyses and t-tests for independent samples, this study (a) examined the degree to which the model of organizational transparency proposed by Rawlins (2008) and tested in healthcare, is consistent in higher education and across different types institutions (i.e., public vs. private), (b) developed a scoring key and instructions for Rawlins' transparency instrument, which adds pragmatic value to the instrument, and (c) compared full-time faculty perceptions of organizational transparency in the two types of institutions. The results from 407 faculty responses revealed that (a) derived latent constructs in higher education were aligned with those identified in the original setting, (b) inter-item agreement differences were identified across factors, and (c) faculty in private institutions reported higher overall transparency scores than faculty in public institutions, although the effect size was small. The study results extend the body of knowledge related to organizational transparency in a new setting and the stakeholder literature by empirically measuring faculty perceptions of organizational transparency in higher education. In addition, the development of the scoring key may be valuable for administrators and leaders attempting to identify institutional strengths and weaknesses relevant to their transparency efforts and reputation.
590 $a School code: 1358.
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0446
710 2 $a Barry University. $b School of Education. $3 2095228
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-10A(E).
790 $a 1358
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10811369