東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

An Evaluation of Design: Low Impact ...

Haffey, Morgan.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Evaluation of Design: Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An Evaluation of Design: Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California./
Author:	Haffey, Morgan.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:	60 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-02(E).
Subject:	Landscape architecture. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10266580
ISBN:	9780355467796

An Evaluation of Design: Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.
Haffey, Morgan.

An Evaluation of Design: Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 60 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2017.

Because of the growth in urbanism, professionals in the environmental industry are often tasked with designing strategies to accommodate urban development while minimizing environmental impact (Selbig & Bannerman, 2008). Converting the natural landscape into residential or commercial developments can drastically alter its hydrologic characteristics (Selbig & Bannerman, 2008). This study compares an existing undeveloped site along the Los Angeles River (scenario 1) with two design scenarios. One design is the city's conceptual plan, referred to as a Mia Lehrer and Associates Design (design scenario 3). The second design incorporates low impact design elements, referred to as the Extended LID Design (design scenario 2). Using these three scenarios and the EPA stormwater calculator, runoff, infiltration, and evaporation will be measured to determine which design is most effective along these three parameters. The Friedman's One Way of Variance Test was applied to the treatments in order to determine which design was most successful concerning stormwater management. The results show that the design with LID controls are significantly greater than the existing conditions (p<0.005).

ISBN: 9780355467796Subjects--Topical Terms:

541842
Landscape architecture.

An Evaluation of Design: Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.
LDR:02152nmm a2200301 4500 001 2159894
005 20180712070704.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355467796
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10266580
035 $a (MiAaPQ)grad.msu:15147
035 $a AAI10266580
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Haffey, Morgan. $3 3347797
245 1 3 $a An Evaluation of Design: Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 60 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.
500 $a Adviser: Patricia Machemer.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2017.
520 $a Because of the growth in urbanism, professionals in the environmental industry are often tasked with designing strategies to accommodate urban development while minimizing environmental impact (Selbig & Bannerman, 2008). Converting the natural landscape into residential or commercial developments can drastically alter its hydrologic characteristics (Selbig & Bannerman, 2008). This study compares an existing undeveloped site along the Los Angeles River (scenario 1) with two design scenarios. One design is the city's conceptual plan, referred to as a Mia Lehrer and Associates Design (design scenario 3). The second design incorporates low impact design elements, referred to as the Extended LID Design (design scenario 2). Using these three scenarios and the EPA stormwater calculator, runoff, infiltration, and evaporation will be measured to determine which design is most effective along these three parameters. The Friedman's One Way of Variance Test was applied to the treatments in order to determine which design was most successful concerning stormwater management. The results show that the design with LID controls are significantly greater than the existing conditions (p<0.005).
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Landscape architecture. $3 541842
650 4 $a Water resources management. $3 794747
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0595
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Environmental Design. $3 2103972
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-02(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10266580