東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Developing and Validating a New Phys...

Kercher, Vanessa Marie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Developing and Validating a New Physical Activity Goal Instrument: Can the Reasons to Exercise (REX) Scale Identify Profiles that Enhance Physical Activity Behaviors?.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Developing and Validating a New Physical Activity Goal Instrument: Can the Reasons to Exercise (REX) Scale Identify Profiles that Enhance Physical Activity Behaviors?./
作者:	Kercher, Vanessa Marie.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	214 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-11B(E).
標題:	Behavioral sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10253138
ISBN:	9780355043990

Developing and Validating a New Physical Activity Goal Instrument: Can the Reasons to Exercise (REX) Scale Identify Profiles that Enhance Physical Activity Behaviors?.
Kercher, Vanessa Marie.

Developing and Validating a New Physical Activity Goal Instrument: Can the Reasons to Exercise (REX) Scale Identify Profiles that Enhance Physical Activity Behaviors?. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 214 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Idaho, 2017.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Understanding what moves people to be physically active is key to identifying sources of motivation critical to promote engagement, persistence, and adherence in physical activity (PA) programs. Three separate, but related, studies were conducted to develop and validate comprehensive PA goal measure, the Reasons to Exercise (REX) Scale, and establish it as a viable measurement of reasons people have for exercising and/or being physically active. Study 1 developed the final REX Scale item pool. Initial evidence suggested the REX Scale was a valid and reliable measure, although additional work will need to be done to refine the instrument. Examination of the RE X revealed nine latent factors held up under both the unrestricted (i.e., exploratory factor analyses) and restricted (i.e., covariance modeling), and based on Cronbach's alpha, the items within each hypothesized dimension were similar and closely related. Following the development of the RE X, Study 2 assessed the psychometric properties of the Reasons to Exercise-Version 2 (REX-2) in another sample of active adults. A nine-factor, 36-item instrument demonstrated the REX-2 as a useful tool for measuring the reasons people have for exercising in two sample of adults. The multi-group CFAs for gender and age provided reasonable evidence of measurement and structural invariance using the difference in CFI scores as the criterion. Finally, Study 3 examined how clusters created by cluster analysis using reason subscales and PA categories differed across behavioral regulation, passion, mindsets, and PA patterns. The REX-2 subscales were used to create four unique, meaningful reason profiles, and five PA profile groups were formed using PA subscales. Differences among the reason and PA profiles were supportive of model predictions. In the reason profiles, the number of valued reasons and individuals exhibiting more autonomous-focused reasons for being physically active led to more desirable outcomes that those with fewer valued exercise reasons or individuals exhibiting more control-focused reasons. In the PA profile findings, motivation was critical to PA engagement, and individuals engaging in higher-intensity type of physical activities were more autonomously motivated.

ISBN: 9780355043990Subjects--Topical Terms:

529833
Behavioral sciences.

Developing and Validating a New Physical Activity Goal Instrument: Can the Reasons to Exercise (REX) Scale Identify Profiles that Enhance Physical Activity Behaviors?.
LDR:03393nmm a2200325 4500 001 2159714
005 20180703102249.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355043990
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10253138
035 $a (MiAaPQ)idaho:11071
035 $a AAI10253138
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kercher, Vanessa Marie. $3 3347587
245 1 0 $a Developing and Validating a New Physical Activity Goal Instrument: Can the Reasons to Exercise (REX) Scale Identify Profiles that Enhance Physical Activity Behaviors?.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 214 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Damon Burton.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Idaho, 2017.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a Understanding what moves people to be physically active is key to identifying sources of motivation critical to promote engagement, persistence, and adherence in physical activity (PA) programs. Three separate, but related, studies were conducted to develop and validate comprehensive PA goal measure, the Reasons to Exercise (REX) Scale, and establish it as a viable measurement of reasons people have for exercising and/or being physically active. Study 1 developed the final REX Scale item pool. Initial evidence suggested the REX Scale was a valid and reliable measure, although additional work will need to be done to refine the instrument. Examination of the RE X revealed nine latent factors held up under both the unrestricted (i.e., exploratory factor analyses) and restricted (i.e., covariance modeling), and based on Cronbach's alpha, the items within each hypothesized dimension were similar and closely related. Following the development of the RE X, Study 2 assessed the psychometric properties of the Reasons to Exercise-Version 2 (REX-2) in another sample of active adults. A nine-factor, 36-item instrument demonstrated the REX-2 as a useful tool for measuring the reasons people have for exercising in two sample of adults. The multi-group CFAs for gender and age provided reasonable evidence of measurement and structural invariance using the difference in CFI scores as the criterion. Finally, Study 3 examined how clusters created by cluster analysis using reason subscales and PA categories differed across behavioral regulation, passion, mindsets, and PA patterns. The REX-2 subscales were used to create four unique, meaningful reason profiles, and five PA profile groups were formed using PA subscales. Differences among the reason and PA profiles were supportive of model predictions. In the reason profiles, the number of valued reasons and individuals exhibiting more autonomous-focused reasons for being physically active led to more desirable outcomes that those with fewer valued exercise reasons or individuals exhibiting more control-focused reasons. In the PA profile findings, motivation was critical to PA engagement, and individuals engaging in higher-intensity type of physical activities were more autonomously motivated.
590 $a School code: 0089.
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0575
710 2 $a University of Idaho. $b Movement and Leisure Sciences. $3 3347588
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-11B(E).
790 $a 0089
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10253138