東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The difference in instructional desi...

Fernandez, Jessica.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The difference in instructional designers and online instructors in determining quality in online courses utilizing the quality matters program.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The difference in instructional designers and online instructors in determining quality in online courses utilizing the quality matters program./
作者:	Fernandez, Jessica.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	113 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-08A(E).
標題:	Instructional design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10037459
ISBN:	9781339548111

The difference in instructional designers and online instructors in determining quality in online courses utilizing the quality matters program.
Fernandez, Jessica.

The difference in instructional designers and online instructors in determining quality in online courses utilizing the quality matters program. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 113 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2016.

MarylandOnline developed the Quality Matters (QM) program to evaluate online courses using a rubric that communicates and measures expectations, criteria, and levels of quality. Education stakeholders include instructional designers, online instructors, online students, administrators, and accrediting agencies. Online instructors may not have instructional design skills necessary to evaluate whether course designers have implemented instructional design principles in an online course. However, instructional designers are experts in the implementation of technology, instructional design processes, and instructional design principles. The purpose of this study was to determine if an association exists between the overall evaluations of alignment in an online course as measured by the QM Rubric for online instructors and instructional designers. Utilizing the QM Rubric to evaluate an online course, scores obtained from the evaluations by 10 instructional designers were compared to the scores obtained from the evaluations by 10 online instructors. According to the quantitative analysis, the results of the chi-square test of independence indicated no association between the overall evaluations of alignment in an online course as measured by the QM Rubric for online instructors and instructional designers, p = .170. To show a significant difference, the p value must be less than .05, p < .05. Though the study showed no significant difference, there are limitations that affected the outcome of the research design. The limitations included the small sample size, the lack of accessibility of the QM Rubric with annotations, the limitation of the type of data the research design could produce, and the lack of verification of the qualifications of the participants of the study.

ISBN: 9781339548111Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172279
Instructional design.

The difference in instructional designers and online instructors in determining quality in online courses utilizing the quality matters program.
LDR:02806nmm a2200301 4500 001 2158884
005 20180618095010.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339548111
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10037459
035 $a (MiAaPQ)capella:18202
035 $a AAI10037459
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fernandez, Jessica. $3 3346735
245 1 4 $a The difference in instructional designers and online instructors in determining quality in online courses utilizing the quality matters program.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 113 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Wendy Zender.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2016.
520 $a MarylandOnline developed the Quality Matters (QM) program to evaluate online courses using a rubric that communicates and measures expectations, criteria, and levels of quality. Education stakeholders include instructional designers, online instructors, online students, administrators, and accrediting agencies. Online instructors may not have instructional design skills necessary to evaluate whether course designers have implemented instructional design principles in an online course. However, instructional designers are experts in the implementation of technology, instructional design processes, and instructional design principles. The purpose of this study was to determine if an association exists between the overall evaluations of alignment in an online course as measured by the QM Rubric for online instructors and instructional designers. Utilizing the QM Rubric to evaluate an online course, scores obtained from the evaluations by 10 instructional designers were compared to the scores obtained from the evaluations by 10 online instructors. According to the quantitative analysis, the results of the chi-square test of independence indicated no association between the overall evaluations of alignment in an online course as measured by the QM Rubric for online instructors and instructional designers, p = .170. To show a significant difference, the p value must be less than .05, p < .05. Though the study showed no significant difference, there are limitations that affected the outcome of the research design. The limitations included the small sample size, the lack of accessibility of the QM Rubric with annotations, the limitation of the type of data the research design could produce, and the lack of verification of the qualifications of the participants of the study.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Capella University. $b Education. $3 2093659
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-08A(E).
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10037459