東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Comparison of the Influence of Dif...

Foley, Elizabeth A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparison of the Influence of Different Components of the Good Behavior Game in a Preschool Classroom.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Comparison of the Influence of Different Components of the Good Behavior Game in a Preschool Classroom./
作者:	Foley, Elizabeth A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	60 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-02(E).
標題:	Early childhood education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264384
ISBN:	9780355346121

A Comparison of the Influence of Different Components of the Good Behavior Game in a Preschool Classroom.
Foley, Elizabeth A.

A Comparison of the Influence of Different Components of the Good Behavior Game in a Preschool Classroom. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 60 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2017.

The Good Behavior Game (GBG) is a multicomponent treatment package that has been demonstrated to decrease disruptive behavior in various populations (kindergarten through high school-age students) and environments (Barrish et al., 1969; Embry, 2002; Tingstrom et al., 2006). However, there is limited research evaluating the GBG with preschool-age children (Swiezy, Matson, & Box, 1992). Furthermore, few studies have evaluated the effects of various components of the GBG, and of those that have, most have done so only after exposure to the GBG package (Fishbein & Wasik, 1981; Harris & Sherman, 1973; Medland & Stachnik, 1972). Finally, few studies have reported data at the individual level (Medland & Stachnik, 1972). Therefore, the purpose of our study was to (a) evaluate the effects of the GBG on disruptive behavior of preschool children during group instruction, (b) evaluate the effects of the major components of the GBG before and after implementation of the GBG package, and (c) examine effects at both the group and individual level. Results suggest that the GBG package was necessary for decreasing disruptive behavior. However, after exposure to the GBG, a response-independent contingency was effective for maintaining low levels of disruptive behavior.

ISBN: 9780355346121Subjects--Topical Terms:

518817
Early childhood education.

A Comparison of the Influence of Different Components of the Good Behavior Game in a Preschool Classroom.
LDR:02214nmm a2200301 4500 001 2155826
005 20180511093052.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355346121
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10264384
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ku:15149
035 $a AAI10264384
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Foley, Elizabeth A. $3 3343569
245 1 2 $a A Comparison of the Influence of Different Components of the Good Behavior Game in a Preschool Classroom.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 60 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.
500 $a Adviser: Claudia L. Dozier.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2017.
520 $a The Good Behavior Game (GBG) is a multicomponent treatment package that has been demonstrated to decrease disruptive behavior in various populations (kindergarten through high school-age students) and environments (Barrish et al., 1969; Embry, 2002; Tingstrom et al., 2006). However, there is limited research evaluating the GBG with preschool-age children (Swiezy, Matson, & Box, 1992). Furthermore, few studies have evaluated the effects of various components of the GBG, and of those that have, most have done so only after exposure to the GBG package (Fishbein & Wasik, 1981; Harris & Sherman, 1973; Medland & Stachnik, 1972). Finally, few studies have reported data at the individual level (Medland & Stachnik, 1972). Therefore, the purpose of our study was to (a) evaluate the effects of the GBG on disruptive behavior of preschool children during group instruction, (b) evaluate the effects of the major components of the GBG before and after implementation of the GBG package, and (c) examine effects at both the group and individual level. Results suggest that the GBG package was necessary for decreasing disruptive behavior. However, after exposure to the GBG, a response-independent contingency was effective for maintaining low levels of disruptive behavior.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Early childhood education. $3 518817
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
690 $a 0518
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Applied Behavioral Science. $3 1019323
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-02(E).
790 $a 0099
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264384