東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Guidelines for interpretive intervie...

Garrett, Amanda L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial./
作者:	Garrett, Amanda L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-12B(E).
標題:	Health sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10143331
ISBN:	9781339985657

Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
Garrett, Amanda L.

Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 156 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2016.

Interviews fascinate and capture individuals' attention. Researchers value the data they glean from interviews, while participants enjoy being asked to share their voices and opinions. Some of the most complex, stringent research designs are now being revised to include interviews, such as randomized controlled trials. But, how do we know that the interviews that are conducted are valid? We need to know more about how interviews are developed and delivered within the context of intervention research. Therefore, the aim of this methodological dissertation is to create a set of recommendations for interpretive interviews in a mixed methods randomized controlled trial. This dissertation research is part of a larger NIH-funded longitudinal research project on exercise adherence. Through qualitative analysis, dialectical pluralism of research paradigms, and literature on treatment fidelity and validity, the interview fidelity process emerged. Findings indicated five interview fidelity ideals: (1) research contributions, (2) interviewer-participant association, (3) participant accommodation, (4) process and procedures, and (5) data management dimensions. Implications for various research audiences are discussed. Outcomes will assist researchers in processing interviews to encourage and increase validity within the context of intervention trial mixed methods studies and the broader base of all mixed methods studies utilizing interviews.

ISBN: 9781339985657Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168359
Health sciences.

Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
LDR:02480nmm a2200301 4500 001 2155270
005 20180426091041.5
008 190424s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339985657
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10143331
035 $a (MiAaPQ)unl:12507
035 $a AAI10143331
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Garrett, Amanda L. $3 3343011
245 1 0 $a Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Susan M. Swearer; Wayne A. Babchuk.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2016.
520 $a Interviews fascinate and capture individuals' attention. Researchers value the data they glean from interviews, while participants enjoy being asked to share their voices and opinions. Some of the most complex, stringent research designs are now being revised to include interviews, such as randomized controlled trials. But, how do we know that the interviews that are conducted are valid? We need to know more about how interviews are developed and delivered within the context of intervention research. Therefore, the aim of this methodological dissertation is to create a set of recommendations for interpretive interviews in a mixed methods randomized controlled trial. This dissertation research is part of a larger NIH-funded longitudinal research project on exercise adherence. Through qualitative analysis, dialectical pluralism of research paradigms, and literature on treatment fidelity and validity, the interview fidelity process emerged. Findings indicated five interview fidelity ideals: (1) research contributions, (2) interviewer-participant association, (3) participant accommodation, (4) process and procedures, and (5) data management dimensions. Implications for various research audiences are discussed. Outcomes will assist researchers in processing interviews to encourage and increase validity within the context of intervention trial mixed methods studies and the broader base of all mixed methods studies utilizing interviews.
590 $a School code: 0138.
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a The University of Nebraska - Lincoln. $b Educational Psychology. $3 1022579
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-12B(E).
790 $a 0138
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10143331