東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Case Study: How a State Education ...

Hickman, Barbara.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Case Study: How a State Education Agency Leads the Implementation of Results Driven Accountability.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Case Study: How a State Education Agency Leads the Implementation of Results Driven Accountability./
作者:	Hickman, Barbara.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	205 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-04A(E).
標題:	Educational leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10685214
ISBN:	9780355568066

A Case Study: How a State Education Agency Leads the Implementation of Results Driven Accountability.
Hickman, Barbara.

A Case Study: How a State Education Agency Leads the Implementation of Results Driven Accountability. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 205 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northern Arizona University, 2017.

The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA) was signed into law on November 29th, 1975 by Republican President Gerald Ford and as he signed it, he acknowledged that while the intent of the law was a step forward, the aspirations were complex. The law was renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 1990, and has undergone updates and revisions roughly every five years since its inception. Despite these continual modifications, the academic and social outcomes for students with disabilities lags far behind that of their regular education peers. In 2012, the Office of Special Education Programs initiated Results-Driven Accountability (RDA) to measure and improve the efficacy of Special Education programs.

ISBN: 9780355568066Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.

A Case Study: How a State Education Agency Leads the Implementation of Results Driven Accountability.
LDR:04129nmm a2200361 4500 001 2155014
005 20180426101950.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355568066
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10685214
035 $a (MiAaPQ)nau:11369
035 $a AAI10685214
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hickman, Barbara. $3 3342761
245 1 2 $a A Case Study: How a State Education Agency Leads the Implementation of Results Driven Accountability.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 205 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Thomas R. Hughes.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northern Arizona University, 2017.
520 $a The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA) was signed into law on November 29th, 1975 by Republican President Gerald Ford and as he signed it, he acknowledged that while the intent of the law was a step forward, the aspirations were complex. The law was renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 1990, and has undergone updates and revisions roughly every five years since its inception. Despite these continual modifications, the academic and social outcomes for students with disabilities lags far behind that of their regular education peers. In 2012, the Office of Special Education Programs initiated Results-Driven Accountability (RDA) to measure and improve the efficacy of Special Education programs.
520 $a In contrast to previous iterations of IDEA monitoring, RDA is not based solely on procedural compliance but makes a critical shift to evaluating special education services by also weighting student outcome based indicators. The literature traces the data that led to the practical and philosophical change to RDA and points to the critical role of State Education Agencies (SEAs) in the success of this initiative. SEAs, long expected to offer training, technical assistance, support and monitoring to all districts with special education programs, are now tasked with the implementation of RDA.
520 $a Through this qualitative case study, the researcher sought to investigate the efforts of a SEA in leading the implementation of RDA by focusing on the initial phases of that process with select Local Education Agencies who are participating in the pilot program. Seven school districts were involved in that program and three of those participated in semi-structured, one-on-one interviews with the researcher. During the interviews, participants were asked to reflect on the process of the RDA pilot program, known as the State Identified Measurable Result (SIMR), and how, in the perception of each district representative, the SEA had best assisted with the implementation scheme. Those interviews were analyzed for recurrent themes about the implementation process and the role of the SEA as perceived by each district. The researcher then conducted a comparative document review to triangulate the information from the interviews with the written plans from the SEA to check for congruency and response to the concerns and perceptions of the initial implementers.
520 $a The researcher concluded that the SEA, in providing a designated literacy coach and instructional strategy assistance through the implementation process, helped to create an environment for improved educational outcomes for students with disabilities in the schools that were part of the pilot program, and that the SEA did incorporate the SIMR LEA's input on areas of challenge in the implementation of RDA.
520 $a The researcher also concluded that LEAs face many barriers to the implementation of RDA, and although most of the barriers are not directly under the control of the SEA, they cannot be ignored as the SEA prepares for a state-wide implementation of RDA.
590 $a School code: 0391.
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a Northern Arizona University. $b Educational Leadership. $3 2092055
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-04A(E).
790 $a 0391
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10685214