東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A description, analysis, and evaluat...

Liu, Feng-Jung.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A description, analysis, and evaluation of selected measurement instruments in art education with recommendations for test construction and use in schools in Taiwan, R.O.C., and U.S.A.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A description, analysis, and evaluation of selected measurement instruments in art education with recommendations for test construction and use in schools in Taiwan, R.O.C., and U.S.A./
Author:	Liu, Feng-Jung.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1990,
Description:	156 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 51-12, Section: A, page: 3999.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International51-12A.
Subject:	Art education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9114323

A description, analysis, and evaluation of selected measurement instruments in art education with recommendations for test construction and use in schools in Taiwan, R.O.C., and U.S.A.
Liu, Feng-Jung.

A description, analysis, and evaluation of selected measurement instruments in art education with recommendations for test construction and use in schools in Taiwan, R.O.C., and U.S.A. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1990 - 156 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 51-12, Section: A, page: 3999.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1990.

The objectives of this study are threefold: (a) to describe the characteristics of selected measurement instruments that assess aesthetic judgment, knowledge about art, and artistic production; (b) to analyze and evaluate the merits and limitations of each measurement instrument in both theoretical and psychometric aspects, and to compare evidence derived from the review with the objectivist assumption to clarify the nature of art tests; and (c) to make recommendations for the appropriate construction and use of art tests in educational settings in both Taiwan, R.O.C., and the U.S.Subjects--Topical Terms:

547650
Art education.

A description, analysis, and evaluation of selected measurement instruments in art education with recommendations for test construction and use in schools in Taiwan, R.O.C., and U.S.A.
LDR:02896nmm a2200301 4500 001 2154071
005 20180322121334.5
008 190424s1990 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9114323
035 $a AAI9114323
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Liu, Feng-Jung. $3 3341794
245 1 2 $a A description, analysis, and evaluation of selected measurement instruments in art education with recommendations for test construction and use in schools in Taiwan, R.O.C., and U.S.A.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1990
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 51-12, Section: A, page: 3999.
500 $a Adviser: George W. Hardiman.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1990.
520 $a The objectives of this study are threefold: (a) to describe the characteristics of selected measurement instruments that assess aesthetic judgment, knowledge about art, and artistic production; (b) to analyze and evaluate the merits and limitations of each measurement instrument in both theoretical and psychometric aspects, and to compare evidence derived from the review with the objectivist assumption to clarify the nature of art tests; and (c) to make recommendations for the appropriate construction and use of art tests in educational settings in both Taiwan, R.O.C., and the U.S.
520 $a A structure for a review model was constructed according to the need of this study. The model involves categories of purpose; content, and constructs; administration; scoring; standardization; validity; reliability; merits; and limitations. The selection of instruments for review is based on three principles: relevance, availability, and completeness. The selection results in eight measurement instruments. Among the instruments, three concerning aesthetic judgment are the Maitland Graves Design Judgment Test; The Meier Art Tests: I, Art Judgment; and The Meier Art Tests: II, Aesthetic Perception. Three other instruments assessing knowledge about art are The Knauber Art Vocabulary Test, The Eisner Art Information Inventory, and Art Vocabulary. The other two instruments measuring artistic production are The Knauber Art Ability Test and The Horn Art Aptitude Inventory.
520 $a Based on the findings of the critiques of the eight tests, further discussions dealt with the issues of measurement in aesthetic judgment, knowledge about art, and artistic production, and commented on the objectivist assumption. According to the findings and discussions, recommendations were made for the appropriate construction and use of art tests in schools in both countries.
590 $a School code: 0090.
650 4 $a Art education. $3 547650
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0273
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. $3 626646
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 51-12A.
790 $a 0090
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 1990
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9114323