東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE AMOUNT OF PH...

HAYES, EDMUND BRICE.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE AMOUNT OF PHONOLOGICAL ENCODING VS. VISUAL PROCESSING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY ADVANCED AMERICAN READERS OF CHINESE MANDARIN AND NATIVE CHINESE READERS.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	AN INVESTIGATION OF THE AMOUNT OF PHONOLOGICAL ENCODING VS. VISUAL PROCESSING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY ADVANCED AMERICAN READERS OF CHINESE MANDARIN AND NATIVE CHINESE READERS./
Author:	HAYES, EDMUND BRICE.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1987,
Description:	142 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 48-01, Section: A, page: 1200.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International48-01A.
Subject:	Modern language. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8710008

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE AMOUNT OF PHONOLOGICAL ENCODING VS. VISUAL PROCESSING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY ADVANCED AMERICAN READERS OF CHINESE MANDARIN AND NATIVE CHINESE READERS.
HAYES, EDMUND BRICE.

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE AMOUNT OF PHONOLOGICAL ENCODING VS. VISUAL PROCESSING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY ADVANCED AMERICAN READERS OF CHINESE MANDARIN AND NATIVE CHINESE READERS. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1987 - 142 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 48-01, Section: A, page: 1200.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 1987.

This study investigated the question: What is the predominant processing strategy used in short term memory by proficient American readers of Chinese Mandarin as compared to the native reader model? Is it primarily phonological, visual or semantic? On the theory that subjects would reveal their predominant strategies by the kinds of errors they made, two word (character) recognition tasks were constructed: at the word level (Experiment I) and at the sentence level (Experiment II). The word level task contained stimuli presented on slides, and corresponding response items containing varying numbers of distractors (i.e. phonologically, graphically or semantically similar to the stimuli, yet incorrect response items) embedded in the response sheets provided the subjects. Subjects circled on the response sheet the characters they believed they had seen on the slide. At the sentence level, the word recognition task was concealed within a sentence validity task where subjects decided whether statements, also containing the aforementioned types of distractors, were true or false. All three types of distractors were randomly dispersed in equal numbers throughout both experiments among actual correct responses (word level) and correct stimuli (sentence level). Errors were tallied, and based upon the predominance of error made (distractors chosen), an indication of the type of processing strategy was obtained.Subjects--Topical Terms:

3174390
Modern language.

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE AMOUNT OF PHONOLOGICAL ENCODING VS. VISUAL PROCESSING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY ADVANCED AMERICAN READERS OF CHINESE MANDARIN AND NATIVE CHINESE READERS.
LDR:03182nmm a2200289 4500 001 2153775
005 20180322121326.5
008 190424s1987 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI8710008
035 $a AAI8710008
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a HAYES, EDMUND BRICE. $3 3341511
245 1 3 $a AN INVESTIGATION OF THE AMOUNT OF PHONOLOGICAL ENCODING VS. VISUAL PROCESSING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY ADVANCED AMERICAN READERS OF CHINESE MANDARIN AND NATIVE CHINESE READERS.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1987
300 $a 142 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 48-01, Section: A, page: 1200.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 1987.
520 $a This study investigated the question: What is the predominant processing strategy used in short term memory by proficient American readers of Chinese Mandarin as compared to the native reader model? Is it primarily phonological, visual or semantic? On the theory that subjects would reveal their predominant strategies by the kinds of errors they made, two word (character) recognition tasks were constructed: at the word level (Experiment I) and at the sentence level (Experiment II). The word level task contained stimuli presented on slides, and corresponding response items containing varying numbers of distractors (i.e. phonologically, graphically or semantically similar to the stimuli, yet incorrect response items) embedded in the response sheets provided the subjects. Subjects circled on the response sheet the characters they believed they had seen on the slide. At the sentence level, the word recognition task was concealed within a sentence validity task where subjects decided whether statements, also containing the aforementioned types of distractors, were true or false. All three types of distractors were randomly dispersed in equal numbers throughout both experiments among actual correct responses (word level) and correct stimuli (sentence level). Errors were tallied, and based upon the predominance of error made (distractors chosen), an indication of the type of processing strategy was obtained.
520 $a A total of 69 slides were administered to 34 subjects in a repeated measures design. The data were subjected to a 2-way analysis of variance.
520 $a Results at the character level revealed that natives remember isolated characters phonologically, and perceive characters first and foremost as a representation of sound. Non-natives used a mixed strategy of both phonological and visual processing at the character level. At the sentence level, non-natives used a predominantly visual strategy, whereas natives used a mix of semantic and visual strategies.
520 $a Various hypotheses were offered as to why the predominance of visual strategies at the sentence level by the non-natives occurred. Implications of these findings as they relate to current methodology of teaching Chinese were also discussed.
590 $a School code: 0168.
650 4 $a Modern language. $3 3174390
690 $a 0291
710 2 $a The Ohio State University. $3 718944
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 48-01A.
790 $a 0168
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1987
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8710008