東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Evaluating listening effort using ev...

Kemp, Amy.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluating listening effort using event-related brain potentials.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Evaluating listening effort using event-related brain potentials./
Author:	Kemp, Amy.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	66 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-04(E).
Subject:	Audiology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10108860
ISBN:	9781339721941

Evaluating listening effort using event-related brain potentials.
Kemp, Amy.

Evaluating listening effort using event-related brain potentials. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 66 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2016.

Maximizing the efficiency of listening effort is a critical goal for hearing rehabilitation. The current study evaluates modulations in brain functions underlying semantic processing in easier versus more challenging listening conditions. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) present an ideal methodology for evaluating changes in neural processes as a function of listening effort. Neural processes underlying semantics, indexed by the N400, were elicited by final words of sentences with higher compared to lower likelihood of completing a sentence. Participants were required to respond with longer (1000ms), middle (700ms), or shorter (400ms) response time deadlines (RTDs). Thirty-six typical adults completed the paradigm. Response accuracy was greater for longer RTDs compared to middle and shorter RTDs. Additionally, accuracy was higher for final words that were more predictable compared to words that were less predictable. Additionally, N400 peak latencies were longer for the middle and shorter RTDs compared to the longer RTD, specifically for the words that were less likely to complete the sentence. This approach utilizes an index of semantics, the N400, as the marker of LE. The delayed N400 response is thought to reflect the increased listening effort for more challenging conditions and may result from the increased cognitive demands associated with greater listening effort.

ISBN: 9781339721941Subjects--Topical Terms:

537237
Audiology.

Evaluating listening effort using event-related brain potentials.
LDR:02275nmm a2200289 4500 001 2127014
005 20171206144944.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339721941
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10108860
035 $a AAI10108860
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kemp, Amy. $3 3289121
245 1 0 $a Evaluating listening effort using event-related brain potentials.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 66 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-04.
500 $a Adviser: Amanda Hampton Wray.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2016.
520 $a Maximizing the efficiency of listening effort is a critical goal for hearing rehabilitation. The current study evaluates modulations in brain functions underlying semantic processing in easier versus more challenging listening conditions. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) present an ideal methodology for evaluating changes in neural processes as a function of listening effort. Neural processes underlying semantics, indexed by the N400, were elicited by final words of sentences with higher compared to lower likelihood of completing a sentence. Participants were required to respond with longer (1000ms), middle (700ms), or shorter (400ms) response time deadlines (RTDs). Thirty-six typical adults completed the paradigm. Response accuracy was greater for longer RTDs compared to middle and shorter RTDs. Additionally, accuracy was higher for final words that were more predictable compared to words that were less predictable. Additionally, N400 peak latencies were longer for the middle and shorter RTDs compared to the longer RTD, specifically for the words that were less likely to complete the sentence. This approach utilizes an index of semantics, the N400, as the marker of LE. The delayed N400 response is thought to reflect the increased listening effort for more challenging conditions and may result from the increased cognitive demands associated with greater listening effort.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Audiology. $3 537237
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
690 $a 0300
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Communicative Sciences and Disorders. $3 3186003
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-04(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10108860