東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRA...

SCHWARTZ, KATHLEEN BARKER.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM IN EDUCATION, 1900-1920: "ONE SPECIALIZES IN SCIENCE, THE OTHER IN PRACTICE" (BOBBIT, FOLLETT, TAYLOR, HALEY, HOXIE).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM IN EDUCATION, 1900-1920: "ONE SPECIALIZES IN SCIENCE, THE OTHER IN PRACTICE" (BOBBIT, FOLLETT, TAYLOR, HALEY, HOXIE)./
作者:	SCHWARTZ, KATHLEEN BARKER.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1986,
面頁冊數:	131 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-06, Section: A, page: 2056.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International47-06A.
標題:	Education history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8620723

SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM IN EDUCATION, 1900-1920: "ONE SPECIALIZES IN SCIENCE, THE OTHER IN PRACTICE" (BOBBIT, FOLLETT, TAYLOR, HALEY, HOXIE).
SCHWARTZ, KATHLEEN BARKER.

SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM IN EDUCATION, 1900-1920: "ONE SPECIALIZES IN SCIENCE, THE OTHER IN PRACTICE" (BOBBIT, FOLLETT, TAYLOR, HALEY, HOXIE). - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1986 - 131 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-06, Section: A, page: 2056.

Thesis (Educat.D.)--Harvard University, 1986.

In the early part of this century there was a movement in education to centralize the administration of the schools and to seat absolute authority in the office of the superintendent. The administrative reformers who led this movement held a set of ideas which paralleled those advanced by Frederick W Taylor in a movement in industry known as scientific management.Subjects--Topical Terms:

3171959
Education history.

SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM IN EDUCATION, 1900-1920: "ONE SPECIALIZES IN SCIENCE, THE OTHER IN PRACTICE" (BOBBIT, FOLLETT, TAYLOR, HALEY, HOXIE).
LDR:02810nmm a2200289 4500 001 2124482
005 20171030105241.5
008 180830s1986 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI8620723
035 $a AAI8620723
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a SCHWARTZ, KATHLEEN BARKER. $3 3286486
245 1 0 $a SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM IN EDUCATION, 1900-1920: "ONE SPECIALIZES IN SCIENCE, THE OTHER IN PRACTICE" (BOBBIT, FOLLETT, TAYLOR, HALEY, HOXIE).
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1986
300 $a 131 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-06, Section: A, page: 2056.
502 $a Thesis (Educat.D.)--Harvard University, 1986.
520 $a In the early part of this century there was a movement in education to centralize the administration of the schools and to seat absolute authority in the office of the superintendent. The administrative reformers who led this movement held a set of ideas which paralleled those advanced by Frederick W Taylor in a movement in industry known as scientific management.
520 $a Taylor advocated a system of management based on "scientific" principles. The system included the notion of the expert manager who would oversee the workers and all aspects of production. In education, the administrative reformers advocated a science of school management which implicitly separated administration from the practice of teaching. They proposed that the superintendent, as educational expert, would oversee teachers and the workings of the classroom.
520 $a This thesis is an analysis of the ideology of scientific management, first as manifested in industry, and then as expressed in education through the ideas of Franklin Bobbitt, a leading proponent of administrative reform in education. The thesis also examines organized labor's criticism of Taylorism and presents an alternative model of management proposed by Mary Parker Follett. Follett's ideas on industrial democracy are contrasted with those underlying scientific management.
520 $a Parallel to Follett's vision of democratic management was a perspective in education predicated on teacher participation in school governance. This ideal of democracy in education, championed by John Dewey, Ella Flagg Young, and Margaret Haley, challenged the assumptions of the administrative reformers about how schools should be organized and managed. This historical inquiry examines the ideas behind the two perspectives on school reform and shows how they led to very different conceptualizations of administration and teaching.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Education history. $3 3171959
690 $a 0520
710 2 $a Harvard University. $3 528741
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 47-06A.
790 $a 0084
791 $a Educat.D.
792 $a 1986
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8620723