東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Impact of Active Learning Teachi...

Cobb, Christina.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Impact of Active Learning Teaching Strategies in a Prescribed Mathematics Course.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Impact of Active Learning Teaching Strategies in a Prescribed Mathematics Course./
作者:	Cobb, Christina.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	131 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-10A(E).
標題:	Curriculum development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264824
ISBN:	9781369815634

The Impact of Active Learning Teaching Strategies in a Prescribed Mathematics Course.
Cobb, Christina.

The Impact of Active Learning Teaching Strategies in a Prescribed Mathematics Course. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 131 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Tennessee State University, 2017.

This study tested the differences between active learning teaching strategies and direct instruction teaching strategies. This study took place at Middle Tennessee State University in the University Studies Department of Mathematics. This study involved four course sections of MATH 1010K (Math for General Studies). The researcher (teacher), used cluster and convenience sampling to select two sections of MATH1010K to receive treatment (active learning teaching strategies). The quantitative quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test design was used to examine the impact of active learning teaching strategies in a prescribed mathematics course as compared to a control group of direct instruction. The current research was conducted in four phases and was completed in four weeks. Those phases were the following: pre-test, treatment, post-test, and attitude survey. The departmental exam was used as the pre-and post-test and the Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory (ATMI) was used as the attitudes toward mathematics survey. An independent samples t-test for independent groups was employed to determine if significant differences existed between active learning and direct instruction in student's math performance in MATH 1010K. Statistical analyses indicated that there were no significant differences (p > .05) between active learning and direct instruction on exam scores of students in Math 1010K. Also an independent samples t-test for the attitudes of students in MATH 1010K was conducted to determine if significant differences existed between active learning and direct instruction. There were statistically significant differences (p < .05) for the following two questions: "can solve math without too much difficulty" and "like to avoid using math in college."

ISBN: 9781369815634Subjects--Topical Terms:

684418
Curriculum development.

The Impact of Active Learning Teaching Strategies in a Prescribed Mathematics Course.
LDR:02697nmm a2200289 4500 001 2123842
005 20171010112651.5
008 180830s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369815634
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10264824
035 $a AAI10264824
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cobb, Christina. $3 3285789
245 1 4 $a The Impact of Active Learning Teaching Strategies in a Prescribed Mathematics Course.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 131 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Show-Mei Lin.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Tennessee State University, 2017.
520 $a This study tested the differences between active learning teaching strategies and direct instruction teaching strategies. This study took place at Middle Tennessee State University in the University Studies Department of Mathematics. This study involved four course sections of MATH 1010K (Math for General Studies). The researcher (teacher), used cluster and convenience sampling to select two sections of MATH1010K to receive treatment (active learning teaching strategies). The quantitative quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test design was used to examine the impact of active learning teaching strategies in a prescribed mathematics course as compared to a control group of direct instruction. The current research was conducted in four phases and was completed in four weeks. Those phases were the following: pre-test, treatment, post-test, and attitude survey. The departmental exam was used as the pre-and post-test and the Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory (ATMI) was used as the attitudes toward mathematics survey. An independent samples t-test for independent groups was employed to determine if significant differences existed between active learning and direct instruction in student's math performance in MATH 1010K. Statistical analyses indicated that there were no significant differences (p > .05) between active learning and direct instruction on exam scores of students in Math 1010K. Also an independent samples t-test for the attitudes of students in MATH 1010K was conducted to determine if significant differences existed between active learning and direct instruction. There were statistically significant differences (p < .05) for the following two questions: "can solve math without too much difficulty" and "like to avoid using math in college."
590 $a School code: 0840.
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Mathematics. $3 515831
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0405
710 2 $a Tennessee State University. $b Educational Administration. $3 1026371
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-10A(E).
790 $a 0840
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264824