東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Developing the 'Understanding Librar...

Rodriguez, Derek Alan.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Developing the 'Understanding Library Impacts' protocol: A method for detecting and communicating academic library impact on student learning.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Developing the 'Understanding Library Impacts' protocol: A method for detecting and communicating academic library impact on student learning./
Author:	Rodriguez, Derek Alan.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2012,
Description:	430 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-01A(E).
Subject:	Library science. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3526152
ISBN:	9781267599858

Developing the 'Understanding Library Impacts' protocol: A method for detecting and communicating academic library impact on student learning.
Rodriguez, Derek Alan.

Developing the 'Understanding Library Impacts' protocol: A method for detecting and communicating academic library impact on student learning. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2012 - 430 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2012.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

The Understanding Library Impacts (ULI) protocol is a suite of instruments designed to demonstrate connections between undergraduate student use of the academic library and faculty-defined expectations for student learning. The ULI protocol features a Critical Incident Technique (CIT) survey for exploring student use of the library during 'high-impact' academic experiences such as capstone courses. A 'Learning Activities Crosswalk' links student use of the library to faculty-defined, discipline-specific and general education expectations for student learning. This methodological study evaluated the protocol with a population of undergraduate students enrolled in upper-level and capstone history courses at six colleges and universities.

ISBN: 9781267599858Subjects--Topical Terms:

539284
Library science.

Developing the 'Understanding Library Impacts' protocol: A method for detecting and communicating academic library impact on student learning.
LDR:03751nmm a2200361 4500 001 2123717
005 20171002081657.5
008 180830s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267599858
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3526152
035 $a AAI3526152
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rodriguez, Derek Alan. $3 3285652
245 1 0 $a Developing the 'Understanding Library Impacts' protocol: A method for detecting and communicating academic library impact on student learning.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2012
300 $a 430 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Helen R. Tibbo.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2012.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a The Understanding Library Impacts (ULI) protocol is a suite of instruments designed to demonstrate connections between undergraduate student use of the academic library and faculty-defined expectations for student learning. The ULI protocol features a Critical Incident Technique (CIT) survey for exploring student use of the library during 'high-impact' academic experiences such as capstone courses. A 'Learning Activities Crosswalk' links student use of the library to faculty-defined, discipline-specific and general education expectations for student learning. This methodological study evaluated the protocol with a population of undergraduate students enrolled in upper-level and capstone history courses at six colleges and universities.
520 $a The protocol focuses on students' use of traditional and electronic information resources, library services, and library facilities during learning activities associated with 'high-impact' experiences in the academic major. Learning activities are stages in 'high-impact' coursework during which students develop and demonstrate desired learning outcomes. The Learning Activities Crosswalk creates credible connections between information use behaviors during these learning activities and faculty-defined expectations for student learning.
520 $a A web-based survey using the Critical Incident Technique gathers quantitative and qualitative data about students' information uses when completing 'high-impact' coursework. Created and refined in two interview-based pilot studies, respondents identify the information resources, services, and facilities used when completing coursework and the learning activities each use supported. Partially-open questions identify the factors of library use that were helpful or problematic to students during their coursework. Open-ended questions gather qualitative data and user stories that reinforce other findings.
520 $a Undergraduates enrolled in history courses at the six study sites reported 127 critical incidents. Responses from the survey and results from the Learning Activities Crosswalk were entered into a database for analysis and presentation to study sites. Statistical and qualitative techniques were used to assess the validity and reliability of findings.
520 $a The study demonstrated a method for exploring library use as a component of student effort within the context of academic 'work tasks' and illustrated the power of the CIT for exploring library impact. The project also generated an extensible and scalable framework for detecting and communicating library contributions to student learning.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Library science. $3 539284
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Information & Library Science. $3 1676100
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-01A(E).
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3526152