東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

"No sovereign nation, no reservation...

McCune, Meghan Y.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

"No sovereign nation, no reservation": Opposing Haudenosaunee sovereignty through land claim and fee-to-trust discourse.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	"No sovereign nation, no reservation": Opposing Haudenosaunee sovereignty through land claim and fee-to-trust discourse./
作者:	McCune, Meghan Y.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	182 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
標題:	Cultural anthropology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3702527
ISBN:	9781321739015

"No sovereign nation, no reservation": Opposing Haudenosaunee sovereignty through land claim and fee-to-trust discourse.
McCune, Meghan Y.

"No sovereign nation, no reservation": Opposing Haudenosaunee sovereignty through land claim and fee-to-trust discourse. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 182 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2015.

In 1974, the United States Supreme Court Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida decision opened the federal courts to Native American land claims against states and many Native Nations have since used the United States legal system to file land claims. In the wake of the now landmark 2005 United States Supreme Court decision City of Sherrill v. The Oneida Indian Nation of New York, Native Nations have found it nearly impossible to seek redress through the courts and many have turned to the fee-to-trust process as a means of regaining land. Beginning in the 1970s and 1980s when the Oneida Indian Nation and Cayuga Indian Nation successfully filed their land claims, non-Native communities---affected by 50 years of economic decline---organized and systematically challenged the exercise of Haudenosaunee sovereignty in Central New York State. Specifically, since its inception in 1980 the Cayuga Nation's land claim has been met with local opposition in the form of organized grassroots anti-Indian sovereignty movements---most notably Upstate Citizens for Equality (UCE).

ISBN: 9781321739015Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122764
Cultural anthropology.

"No sovereign nation, no reservation": Opposing Haudenosaunee sovereignty through land claim and fee-to-trust discourse.
LDR:02857nmm a2200301 4500 001 2123528
005 20171003070900.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321739015
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3702527
035 $a AAI3702527
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a McCune, Meghan Y. $3 3285451
245 1 0 $a "No sovereign nation, no reservation": Opposing Haudenosaunee sovereignty through land claim and fee-to-trust discourse.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 182 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mindy J. Morgan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2015.
520 $a In 1974, the United States Supreme Court Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida decision opened the federal courts to Native American land claims against states and many Native Nations have since used the United States legal system to file land claims. In the wake of the now landmark 2005 United States Supreme Court decision City of Sherrill v. The Oneida Indian Nation of New York, Native Nations have found it nearly impossible to seek redress through the courts and many have turned to the fee-to-trust process as a means of regaining land. Beginning in the 1970s and 1980s when the Oneida Indian Nation and Cayuga Indian Nation successfully filed their land claims, non-Native communities---affected by 50 years of economic decline---organized and systematically challenged the exercise of Haudenosaunee sovereignty in Central New York State. Specifically, since its inception in 1980 the Cayuga Nation's land claim has been met with local opposition in the form of organized grassroots anti-Indian sovereignty movements---most notably Upstate Citizens for Equality (UCE).
520 $a This dissertation draws from ethnographic research of UCE and analyzes varying interpretations of law, policy, race, and class that inform non-Native understandings and attitudes towards Haudenosaunee sovereignty. Social norms of public discourse discourage direct conversations of race and class and, as a result, such discourses must take other normative forms; in UCE land claim and fee-to-trust discourse, linguistic frames of property (and property rights), patriotism, equality, and assimilation are used to challenge Indigenous sovereignty while also serving to resist labels of racism/anti-Indianism. This analysis also includes UCE's use of litigation and legal discourse to formulate---and in turn perpetuate---(mis)understandings of Indigenous land rights, identity, and sovereignty.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
650 4 $a Native American studies. $3 2122730
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0740
710 2 0 $a Michigan State University. $b Anthropology. $3 3285452
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3702527