東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Effect of Instructed Distorted R...

Ryan, Kori.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effect of Instructed Distorted Responding on the True Response Inconsistency Scale of the Jesness-Inventory Revised.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Effect of Instructed Distorted Responding on the True Response Inconsistency Scale of the Jesness-Inventory Revised./
Author:	Ryan, Kori.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	104 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-03A(E).
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3644372
ISBN:	9781321325379

The Effect of Instructed Distorted Responding on the True Response Inconsistency Scale of the Jesness-Inventory Revised.
Ryan, Kori.

The Effect of Instructed Distorted Responding on the True Response Inconsistency Scale of the Jesness-Inventory Revised. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 104 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Alliant International University, 2015.

Individuals do not always respond to personality self-report inventories in a way that is accurate or reflective of their current state. Psychologists have developed scales to help determine the accuracy with which individuals respond to self-report inventories. Inconsistent responding, one particular response style, is often identified through the use of a True Response Inconsistency Scale (TRIN). This scale measures whether a person responds inconsistently to paired items that when answered in the same manner, contradict each other. Pinsoneault (1998) developed a TRIN for the Jesness Inventory (JI). The JI was revised in 2003 (JI-R). This dissertation examined the utility of the TRIN of the Jesness Inventory-Revised in measuring positive and negative response distortion. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups that received instruction on how to respond to the JI-R; standard, "faking good," and "faking bad" instructions." A one way analysis of variance showed a statistically significant difference between groups. A post-hoc analysis consisting of a Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) found a statistically significant mean score difference between the faking bad group and the honest and faking good groups, but no statistically significant mean score difference between the faking good and normal instruction group. A discriminant analysis determined that the TRIN was able to correctly categorize 69.3% of protocols. The TRIN scale correctly classified 72% of the non-negative response instruction group, and correctly classified 64% of the negative response instruction group. The TRIN scale misclassified 28% of the non-negative response instruction group as the negative response instruction group (faking bad). The negative response instruction protocols were misidentified by the TRIN as non-negative response protocols 36% of the time. Overall, the TRIN showed some promise in assisting an examiner with identifying distorted responses on the JI-R.

ISBN: 9781321325379Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

The Effect of Instructed Distorted Responding on the True Response Inconsistency Scale of the Jesness-Inventory Revised.
LDR:02962nmm a2200289 4500 001 2121785
005 20170811100941.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321325379
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3644372
035 $a AAI3644372
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ryan, Kori. $3 3283720
245 1 4 $a The Effect of Instructed Distorted Responding on the True Response Inconsistency Scale of the Jesness-Inventory Revised.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 104 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Leark.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Alliant International University, 2015.
520 $a Individuals do not always respond to personality self-report inventories in a way that is accurate or reflective of their current state. Psychologists have developed scales to help determine the accuracy with which individuals respond to self-report inventories. Inconsistent responding, one particular response style, is often identified through the use of a True Response Inconsistency Scale (TRIN). This scale measures whether a person responds inconsistently to paired items that when answered in the same manner, contradict each other. Pinsoneault (1998) developed a TRIN for the Jesness Inventory (JI). The JI was revised in 2003 (JI-R). This dissertation examined the utility of the TRIN of the Jesness Inventory-Revised in measuring positive and negative response distortion. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups that received instruction on how to respond to the JI-R; standard, "faking good," and "faking bad" instructions." A one way analysis of variance showed a statistically significant difference between groups. A post-hoc analysis consisting of a Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) found a statistically significant mean score difference between the faking bad group and the honest and faking good groups, but no statistically significant mean score difference between the faking good and normal instruction group. A discriminant analysis determined that the TRIN was able to correctly categorize 69.3% of protocols. The TRIN scale correctly classified 72% of the non-negative response instruction group, and correctly classified 64% of the negative response instruction group. The TRIN scale misclassified 28% of the non-negative response instruction group as the negative response instruction group (faking bad). The negative response instruction protocols were misidentified by the TRIN as non-negative response protocols 36% of the time. Overall, the TRIN showed some promise in assisting an examiner with identifying distorted responses on the JI-R.
590 $a School code: 1634.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0624
710 2 $a Alliant International University. $b San Diego, CSFS. $3 3183935
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-03A(E).
790 $a 1634
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3644372