東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Religiosity and Modern Prejudice: Po...

Chambers, Carissa.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Religiosity and Modern Prejudice: Points of Convergence and Points of Departure.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Religiosity and Modern Prejudice: Points of Convergence and Points of Departure./
作者:	Chambers, Carissa.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
面頁冊數:	181 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-04B(E).
標題:	Counseling Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10161867
ISBN:	9781369167290

Religiosity and Modern Prejudice: Points of Convergence and Points of Departure.
Chambers, Carissa.

Religiosity and Modern Prejudice: Points of Convergence and Points of Departure. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 181 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.

The current study examines the effect of religious orientation, social dominance orientation, right wing authoritarianism, and group socialization on the degree to which covert prejudice beliefs are endorsed. This study is novel in that individual and intergroup factors are simultaneously considered. Unlike much of the existing research, the study measures all six types of religious orientation for a nuanced examination of the different approaches to religion and the effect this has on attitude formation and maintenance. The study also demonstrates higher levels of generalizability in that questionnaires were distributed to a diverse sample and also considered many forms of discrimination (racism, sexism, classism, and heterosexism). Additionally, relevant prejudice measures that better represent covert, modern day prejudice are used in the current study.

ISBN: 9781369167290Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122842
Counseling Psychology.

Religiosity and Modern Prejudice: Points of Convergence and Points of Departure.
LDR:03170nmm a2200313 4500 001 2121743
005 20170811100936.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369167290
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10161867
035 $a AAI10161867
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chambers, Carissa. $3 3283676
245 1 0 $a Religiosity and Modern Prejudice: Points of Convergence and Points of Departure.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 181 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Laura Smith.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.
520 $a The current study examines the effect of religious orientation, social dominance orientation, right wing authoritarianism, and group socialization on the degree to which covert prejudice beliefs are endorsed. This study is novel in that individual and intergroup factors are simultaneously considered. Unlike much of the existing research, the study measures all six types of religious orientation for a nuanced examination of the different approaches to religion and the effect this has on attitude formation and maintenance. The study also demonstrates higher levels of generalizability in that questionnaires were distributed to a diverse sample and also considered many forms of discrimination (racism, sexism, classism, and heterosexism). Additionally, relevant prejudice measures that better represent covert, modern day prejudice are used in the current study.
520 $a Social dominance orientation (SDO) was strongly and positively correlated with all four types of subtle prejudice. In hierarchical regression modeling, right wing authoritarianism was the strongest predictor variable for all prejudice outcome variables. SDO was the second strongest predictor for all variables except for benevolent sexism. Demographic and religious orientation predictors varied by prejudice outcome variable. Only immanence and intrinsic emerged as significant religious orientations predictors. Multiple regression models with only religious orientation predictors were also conducted to examine the relationship of each religious orientation to each prejudice when the other religious orientations were held constant. Different trends for different prejudice attitudes were found for intrinsic and immanence orientations. Quest orientation was negatively correlated with prejudice and extrinsic religious orientation was positively correlated with prejudice for all prejudice outcome variables. Increasing intolerance with more indiscriminately pro- or anti-religious responding was not elicited. Instead a pattern of increasing pro-religiosity was related to higher prejudice scores. Progressive congregational factors correlated with lower colorblind racial attitudes, benevolent sexism, classism, and homonegativity among congregants.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Counseling Psychology. $3 2122842
650 4 $a Religion. $3 516493
650 4 $a Multicultural Education. $3 2122919
690 $a 0603
690 $a 0318
690 $a 0455
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b TC: Counseling Psychology. $3 3188632
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-04B(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10161867