東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

How we pay the piper: The impact of ...

Gallagher, Bridget Kathleen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How we pay the piper: The impact of sources of government funding on arts and culture nonprofit organizations.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How we pay the piper: The impact of sources of government funding on arts and culture nonprofit organizations./
Author:	Gallagher, Bridget Kathleen.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2014,
Description:	224 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-10A(E).
Subject:	Public administration. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3621827
ISBN:	9781303932342

How we pay the piper: The impact of sources of government funding on arts and culture nonprofit organizations.
Gallagher, Bridget Kathleen.

How we pay the piper: The impact of sources of government funding on arts and culture nonprofit organizations. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2014 - 224 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Denver, 2014.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Nonprofit sustainability, or survival, has attracted increased scholarly attention. Government resources are shrinking, and the public sector is increasingly relying on the nonprofit sector to provide goods and services. Nonprofit arts organizations are not excluded from this trend. Historically, the arts have relied on private donations with limited direct government support. The majority of government support for arts and culture organizations derives from legislative appropriations, a system susceptible to sudden changes driven by economic and political changes. Recognizing the broader social and public good provided by arts and culture nonprofits, a number of states have created alternative methods for supporting their state arts agencies. Twenty-nine states have instituted at least one alternative mechanism as a supplement or alternative to legislative appropriations. As governments leverage arts and culture for a variety of policy agenda, it is an appropriate time to evaluate the sustainability of arts and culture nonprofits and investigate the relationship between systems of funding the arts and organizational population patterns in order to determine if the mechanisms by which government funds are generated have an impact on the entry or exit of nonprofit arts and culture organizations. This dissertation is undertaken to assess whether the presence of alternative mechanisms funding state arts agencies (SAAs) improves the sustainability and survival of arts and culture organizations.

ISBN: 9781303932342Subjects--Topical Terms:

531287
Public administration.

How we pay the piper: The impact of sources of government funding on arts and culture nonprofit organizations.
LDR:02547nmm a2200301 4500 001 2120163
005 20170705093024.5
008 180830s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303932342
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3621827
035 $a AAI3621827
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gallagher, Bridget Kathleen. $3 3282070
245 1 0 $a How we pay the piper: The impact of sources of government funding on arts and culture nonprofit organizations.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2014
300 $a 224 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jessica E. Sowa.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Denver, 2014.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a Nonprofit sustainability, or survival, has attracted increased scholarly attention. Government resources are shrinking, and the public sector is increasingly relying on the nonprofit sector to provide goods and services. Nonprofit arts organizations are not excluded from this trend. Historically, the arts have relied on private donations with limited direct government support. The majority of government support for arts and culture organizations derives from legislative appropriations, a system susceptible to sudden changes driven by economic and political changes. Recognizing the broader social and public good provided by arts and culture nonprofits, a number of states have created alternative methods for supporting their state arts agencies. Twenty-nine states have instituted at least one alternative mechanism as a supplement or alternative to legislative appropriations. As governments leverage arts and culture for a variety of policy agenda, it is an appropriate time to evaluate the sustainability of arts and culture nonprofits and investigate the relationship between systems of funding the arts and organizational population patterns in order to determine if the mechanisms by which government funds are generated have an impact on the entry or exit of nonprofit arts and culture organizations. This dissertation is undertaken to assess whether the presence of alternative mechanisms funding state arts agencies (SAAs) improves the sustainability and survival of arts and culture organizations.
590 $a School code: 0765.
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Arts management. $3 3168382
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0424
710 2 $a University of Colorado at Denver. $b Public Affairs. $3 3172906
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-10A(E).
790 $a 0765
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3621827