東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

An analysis of public art on univers...

University of Minnesota., Educational Policy and Administration.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An analysis of public art on university campuses: Policies, procedures, and best practices.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An analysis of public art on university campuses: Policies, procedures, and best practices./
Author:	Grenier, Michael Robert.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2009,
Description:	266 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: 4538.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-12A.
Subject:	Educational administration. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3387262
ISBN:	9781109532135

An analysis of public art on university campuses: Policies, procedures, and best practices.
Grenier, Michael Robert.

An analysis of public art on university campuses: Policies, procedures, and best practices. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2009 - 266 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: 4538.

Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Minnesota, 2009.

This study investigated the policies, procedures, and practices of public art programs on the campuses of research institutions with very high activity as defined by the Carnegie Classification. From this particular type of institution, 55 of the 96 public art administrators provided their opinions, attitudes, and behaviors as part of the "Public Art on Campus Survey." As a result of the data received and analyzed, a clearer picture has emerged regarding the diversity and complexity of public art programming within this specific type of university landscape.

ISBN: 9781109532135Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122799
Educational administration.

An analysis of public art on university campuses: Policies, procedures, and best practices.
LDR:03470nmm a2200337 4500 001 2120161
005 20170705093024.5
008 180830s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109532135
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3387262
035 $a AAI3387262
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Grenier, Michael Robert. $3 3282067
245 1 3 $a An analysis of public art on university campuses: Policies, procedures, and best practices.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2009
300 $a 266 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: 4538.
500 $a Adviser: Darwin D. Hendel.
502 $a Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Minnesota, 2009.
520 $a This study investigated the policies, procedures, and practices of public art programs on the campuses of research institutions with very high activity as defined by the Carnegie Classification. From this particular type of institution, 55 of the 96 public art administrators provided their opinions, attitudes, and behaviors as part of the "Public Art on Campus Survey." As a result of the data received and analyzed, a clearer picture has emerged regarding the diversity and complexity of public art programming within this specific type of university landscape.
520 $a Results indicated a wide range of definitions of what constituted public art, which in part, explains the large variance in numbers of items classified as public art. Statistical tests indicated many benefits experienced by institutions that included public art on campus as part of their articulated institutional master plan. Statistically significant as a group, master plan public art programs experienced an increased frequency of public art on campus, increased funding sources, and increased and on-going budget allocations dedicated to maintaining and restoring public art on campus. This comparative analysis indicated no difference between public and private institutions or between the categories of institutions operating in percent for art states and those that do not operate in a percent for art state.
520 $a There are three major implications indicated from this research of public art on university campuses. First, public art programs that are considered as part of its institutional master plan intensely infuse public art on campus as part of the university life. Secondly, public art programming that is part of their institutional master plan operate as a strategic initiative that provided a democratic shield for university administrators and decision makers. Thirdly, public art on campus programs that reported being part of an institutional master plan promoted the continuous alignment of aims, goals, and objectives through the processes of strategic planning and program evaluation.
520 $a Public art on campus is the physical embodiment of institutional missions and largely contributes to the creation and maintenance of the places where the community can learn, live, and dialogue within an environment rich in meaning. Public art on campus celebrates the search for knowledge, while promoting the free exchanges of ideas. The phenomena of public art on campus can no longer be ignored.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Arts management. $3 3168382
650 4 $a Fine arts. $3 2122690
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0424
690 $a 0357
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $b Educational Policy and Administration. $3 1035320
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-12A.
790 $a 0130
791 $a D.Ed.
792 $a 2009
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3387262