東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Organizing dissonance: What ironies ...

Esch, Joanne.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Organizing dissonance: What ironies of restorative justice practice can teach us about postbureaucratic hybridization.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Organizing dissonance: What ironies of restorative justice practice can teach us about postbureaucratic hybridization./
Author:	Esch, Joanne.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	109 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-05(E).
Subject:	Communication. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1589952
ISBN:	9781321784800

Organizing dissonance: What ironies of restorative justice practice can teach us about postbureaucratic hybridization.
Esch, Joanne.

Organizing dissonance: What ironies of restorative justice practice can teach us about postbureaucratic hybridization. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 109 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2015.

As the restorative justice (RJ) movement has gained momentum nationally, calls for "institutionalization" of RJ have materialized in the form of legislation and funding to increase the use and availability of this participatory, affective, particular/stakeholder-driven approach to conflict-management and criminal justice. Implementation of RJ within or alongside existing safety and justice bureaucracies is a site of collision between divergent and seemingly adversarial organizational forms. This thesis examines how rank-and-file police officers responded to the tensions of RJ implementation, and reveals two ironic outcomes of their referral practices: One irony epitomizes the lamentable bureaucratic tendencies toward alienation, rigidity, and hierarchy and highlights the need for particular and participatory control, while the other affirms the desirability of bureaucratic aims such as fostering procedural and situation-blind justice and minimizing opportunities for bias and discrimination through central/universal control. Applying Ashcraft's (2000, 2006) notion of organized dissonance , I propose that successful RJ institutionalization requires simultaneous achievement of contradictory aims, and present the research site as a case where hybridization of opposing logics is needed but is not adequately realized. By analyzing organizational communication differences between more and less successful cases of post/bureaucratic hybridization, I identify challenges to and possibilities for the intentional cultivation of organized dissonance. I conclude by considering implications for the prospect of a restorative turn in judicial practice.

ISBN: 9781321784800Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

Organizing dissonance: What ironies of restorative justice practice can teach us about postbureaucratic hybridization.
LDR:02659nmm a2200325 4500 001 2119464
005 20170619071235.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321784800
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1589952
035 $a AAI1589952
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Esch, Joanne. $3 3281342
245 1 0 $a Organizing dissonance: What ironies of restorative justice practice can teach us about postbureaucratic hybridization.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 109 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Craig.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2015.
520 $a As the restorative justice (RJ) movement has gained momentum nationally, calls for "institutionalization" of RJ have materialized in the form of legislation and funding to increase the use and availability of this participatory, affective, particular/stakeholder-driven approach to conflict-management and criminal justice. Implementation of RJ within or alongside existing safety and justice bureaucracies is a site of collision between divergent and seemingly adversarial organizational forms. This thesis examines how rank-and-file police officers responded to the tensions of RJ implementation, and reveals two ironic outcomes of their referral practices: One irony epitomizes the lamentable bureaucratic tendencies toward alienation, rigidity, and hierarchy and highlights the need for particular and participatory control, while the other affirms the desirability of bureaucratic aims such as fostering procedural and situation-blind justice and minimizing opportunities for bias and discrimination through central/universal control. Applying Ashcraft's (2000, 2006) notion of organized dissonance , I propose that successful RJ institutionalization requires simultaneous achievement of contradictory aims, and present the research site as a case where hybridization of opposing logics is needed but is not adequately realized. By analyzing organizational communication differences between more and less successful cases of post/bureaucratic hybridization, I identify challenges to and possibilities for the intentional cultivation of organized dissonance. I conclude by considering implications for the prospect of a restorative turn in judicial practice.
590 $a School code: 0051.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Organization theory. $3 2122787
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0635
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a University of Colorado at Boulder. $b Communication. $3 1043819
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-05(E).
790 $a 0051
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1589952