東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Indigenous self-government under sta...

Hiraldo, Danielle V.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Indigenous self-government under state recognition: Comparing strategies in two cases.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Indigenous self-government under state recognition: Comparing strategies in two cases./
Author:	Hiraldo, Danielle V.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	182 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-05A(E).
Subject:	Native American studies. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3742972
ISBN:	9781339356273

Indigenous self-government under state recognition: Comparing strategies in two cases.
Hiraldo, Danielle V.

Indigenous self-government under state recognition: Comparing strategies in two cases. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 182 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2015.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Contemporary events frequently call into question the status of state-recognized Native nations. For example, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) failed to pass a resolution dissolving state-recognized membership; and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has reported on the reality of federal funding being awarded to non-federally recognized Native nations. Although state-recognized Native nations are handicapped in their strategies and the availability of resources to assert their right to self-determine, some have persevered despite the inability to establish a direct relationship with the national government. Reconsidering federalism as it pertains to Native nations reveals opportunities for non-federally recognized Native nations to access resources and assert self-governing authority in alternative arenas outside the exclusive tribal-national government-to-government relationship.

ISBN: 9781339356273Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122730
Native American studies.

Indigenous self-government under state recognition: Comparing strategies in two cases.
LDR:02736nmm a2200313 4500 001 2118988
005 20170616102403.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339356273
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3742972
035 $a AAI3742972
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hiraldo, Danielle V. $3 3280836
245 1 0 $a Indigenous self-government under state recognition: Comparing strategies in two cases.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 182 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Hershey.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2015.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a Contemporary events frequently call into question the status of state-recognized Native nations. For example, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) failed to pass a resolution dissolving state-recognized membership; and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has reported on the reality of federal funding being awarded to non-federally recognized Native nations. Although state-recognized Native nations are handicapped in their strategies and the availability of resources to assert their right to self-determine, some have persevered despite the inability to establish a direct relationship with the national government. Reconsidering federalism as it pertains to Native nations reveals opportunities for non-federally recognized Native nations to access resources and assert self-governing authority in alternative arenas outside the exclusive tribal-national government-to-government relationship.
520 $a My research analyzes how two state-recognized Native nations, the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina and the Waccamaw Indian People of South Carolina, have operated as political actors; have maintained their communities; have organized politically and socially; and have asserted their right to self-determine by engaging state---and at certain times federal---politics to address needs within their communities. I used a qualitative case study approach to examine the strategies these two state-recognized Native nations have developed to engage state relationships. I argue that state-recognized Native nations are developing significant political relationships with their home states and other entities, such as federal, state, and local agencies, and nonprofits, to address issues in their communities.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Native American studies. $3 2122730
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
690 $a 0740
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b American Indian Studies. $3 2096861
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-05A(E).
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3742972