東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Peer review in a graduate writing cl...

Saenpoch, Petcharat.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Peer review in a graduate writing class: Case studies of first- and second - language students.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Peer review in a graduate writing class: Case studies of first- and second - language students./
Author:	Saenpoch, Petcharat.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	145 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-11A(E).
Subject:	Rhetoric. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3708563
ISBN:	9781321839586

Peer review in a graduate writing class: Case studies of first- and second - language students.
Saenpoch, Petcharat.

Peer review in a graduate writing class: Case studies of first- and second - language students. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 145 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2015.

This research explored peer review strategies of L1 (native speakers of English) and L2 (non-native speakers of English) graduate student writers from different disciplines. The focus was on how they revised their writing and which strategies they used. The study was conducted in a Graduate Writing Workshop class at a public university on the U.S. - Mexican border in the United States of America. Five participants were selected as case studies. The researcher collected data by recording face-to-face peer review sessions, observing the class, interviewing the instructor and students, collecting the students' reflections, and gathering the students' writing drafts. The results revealed that L1 and L2 writers used various strategies in peer review, such as asking for clarifications and giving examples. They selected the most helpful comments for their revision, and they found that a peer review group that consisted of the students who were from different language backgrounds and disciplines created the most challenge during peer review sessions. These findings are meaningful for L1 and L2 peer review and writing development in American educational settings and other countries all over the world.

ISBN: 9781321839586Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Peer review in a graduate writing class: Case studies of first- and second - language students.
LDR:02171nmm a2200301 4500 001 2118603
005 20170612074629.5
008 180830s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321839586
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3708563
035 $a AAI3708563
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Saenpoch, Petcharat. $3 3280445
245 1 0 $a Peer review in a graduate writing class: Case studies of first- and second - language students.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 145 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Kate Mangelsdorf.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2015.
520 $a This research explored peer review strategies of L1 (native speakers of English) and L2 (non-native speakers of English) graduate student writers from different disciplines. The focus was on how they revised their writing and which strategies they used. The study was conducted in a Graduate Writing Workshop class at a public university on the U.S. - Mexican border in the United States of America. Five participants were selected as case studies. The researcher collected data by recording face-to-face peer review sessions, observing the class, interviewing the instructor and students, collecting the students' reflections, and gathering the students' writing drafts. The results revealed that L1 and L2 writers used various strategies in peer review, such as asking for clarifications and giving examples. They selected the most helpful comments for their revision, and they found that a peer review group that consisted of the students who were from different language backgrounds and disciplines created the most challenge during peer review sessions. These findings are meaningful for L1 and L2 peer review and writing development in American educational settings and other countries all over the world.
590 $a School code: 0459.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a The University of Texas at El Paso. $b English Rhetoric and Composition. $3 3280446
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-11A(E).
790 $a 0459
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3708563