東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Varieties of Islamism: Differences i...

Nikolaev, Roman.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Varieties of Islamism: Differences in political party ideology in democracies.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Varieties of Islamism: Differences in political party ideology in democracies./
Author:	Nikolaev, Roman.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	230 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-04A(E).
Subject:	Political science. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10163165
ISBN:	9781369179378

Varieties of Islamism: Differences in political party ideology in democracies.
Nikolaev, Roman.

Varieties of Islamism: Differences in political party ideology in democracies. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 230 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2016.

This dissertation aims to understand how Islamist ideology differs across Islamist political parties in majority-Muslim countries. It asks why, despite drawing from the same religious source, the ideology of Islamist parties differs significantly and ranges from a wide spectrum, reaching from rigid conservative ideologies to flexible and even liberal. In order to address this question, the first step I pursue is to create a classification of different types of Islamism based on a spectrum of Islamist thought and behavior. I call the most literalist approach which aims at top-down Islamization Traditionalist Islamism, while the most flexible variety which argues for a bottom-up approach and relies on secular civil law is is labelled Neo-Islamism. Political parties that do not clearly fall under any of these categories and mix characteristics of both are grouped under the Hybrid Islamism category. I argue that if they could, all Islamist parties would moderate their ideology in order to achieve electoral success. However, both the position of the party vis-a-vis other parties in the system, and a high degree of dependence on an internal clique or an external movement create constraints and limitations which prevent parties from moderating their ideological profile. I find support for my argument by comparing five different Islamist parties in Indonesia. I further strengthen my case by introducing several hadow cases from Turkey, Malaysia and Tajikistan (under the authoritarian regime).

ISBN: 9781369179378Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Varieties of Islamism: Differences in political party ideology in democracies.
LDR:02444nmm a2200301 4500 001 2116419
005 20170428111647.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369179378
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10163165
035 $a AAI10163165
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Nikolaev, Roman. $3 3278128
245 1 0 $a Varieties of Islamism: Differences in political party ideology in democracies.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 230 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Paulette Kurzer.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2016.
520 $a This dissertation aims to understand how Islamist ideology differs across Islamist political parties in majority-Muslim countries. It asks why, despite drawing from the same religious source, the ideology of Islamist parties differs significantly and ranges from a wide spectrum, reaching from rigid conservative ideologies to flexible and even liberal. In order to address this question, the first step I pursue is to create a classification of different types of Islamism based on a spectrum of Islamist thought and behavior. I call the most literalist approach which aims at top-down Islamization Traditionalist Islamism, while the most flexible variety which argues for a bottom-up approach and relies on secular civil law is is labelled Neo-Islamism. Political parties that do not clearly fall under any of these categories and mix characteristics of both are grouped under the Hybrid Islamism category. I argue that if they could, all Islamist parties would moderate their ideology in order to achieve electoral success. However, both the position of the party vis-a-vis other parties in the system, and a high degree of dependence on an internal clique or an external movement create constraints and limitations which prevent parties from moderating their ideological profile. I find support for my argument by comparing five different Islamist parties in Indonesia. I further strengthen my case by introducing several hadow cases from Turkey, Malaysia and Tajikistan (under the authoritarian regime).
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Middle Eastern studies. $3 3168421
650 4 $a Islamic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1082939
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0555
690 $a 0512
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Political Science. $3 1270079
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-04A(E).
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10163165