東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Elementary special education resourc...

Seymour, Susan Brooks.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Elementary special education resource teachers' practices and perceptions of curriculum-based measurement.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Elementary special education resource teachers' practices and perceptions of curriculum-based measurement./
Author:	Seymour, Susan Brooks.
Description:	164 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-06A(E).
Subject:	Special education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10242604
ISBN:	9781369565591

Elementary special education resource teachers' practices and perceptions of curriculum-based measurement.
Seymour, Susan Brooks.

Elementary special education resource teachers' practices and perceptions of curriculum-based measurement. - 164 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2016.

This study examined elementary special education resource teachers' practices and perceptions of curriculum-based measurement (CBM). A significant body of research since the 1970's has shown that CBM is a reliable and valid predictor of subsequent performance on a variety of outcome measures, and thus useful for a wide range of instructional decisions (Deno, 2003; Busch & Reschley, 2007). Numerous studies have shown that when teachers use CBM, as originally intended, to write data-based IEP goals, monitor the effects of their instructional programs, and adjust their interventions according to data-based decision rules, student achievement improves (Fuchs, Fuchs, Hamlett, 1989b; Jenkins, Graff & Miglioretti, 2009). Additionally, CBM is a valuable assessment tool for meeting the progress monitoring requirements of the IEP, as set forth in the IDEA. Barriers to implementation include, time constraints, lack of confidence and knowledge in using CBM, and doubt in the validity of some of the measures (Yell, et al., 1992; Foegen, 2001). Despite a very solid research base, CBM is not being used as originally intended and is not being used consistently and accurately by special education teachers to monitor student progress to meet the federal mandate (Estcheidt, 2006; Shinn, 2010). To update the literature and bridge the gap between the earlier studies on CBM and current practices and perceptions of elementary special education teachers a survey questionnaire was used to collect data from 84 elementary special education resource teachers from 15 public schools in the southeast. Results revealed that more special education teachers are using CBM than in the past. They are using CBM to fulfill the federal requirements of the IEP in regards to progress monitoring; however, many special education teachers are not using CBM as originally intended. Time and lack of confidence and knowledge in using some of the components of CBM are still barriers. The results, implications for special education leaders, and recommendations for future research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781369565591Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.

Elementary special education resource teachers' practices and perceptions of curriculum-based measurement.
LDR:03022nmm a2200289 4500 001 2115734
005 20170331102623.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369565591
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10242604
035 $a AAI10242604
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Seymour, Susan Brooks. $3 3277405
245 1 0 $a Elementary special education resource teachers' practices and perceptions of curriculum-based measurement.
300 $a 164 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Kathleen J. Marshall.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2016.
520 $a This study examined elementary special education resource teachers' practices and perceptions of curriculum-based measurement (CBM). A significant body of research since the 1970's has shown that CBM is a reliable and valid predictor of subsequent performance on a variety of outcome measures, and thus useful for a wide range of instructional decisions (Deno, 2003; Busch & Reschley, 2007). Numerous studies have shown that when teachers use CBM, as originally intended, to write data-based IEP goals, monitor the effects of their instructional programs, and adjust their interventions according to data-based decision rules, student achievement improves (Fuchs, Fuchs, Hamlett, 1989b; Jenkins, Graff & Miglioretti, 2009). Additionally, CBM is a valuable assessment tool for meeting the progress monitoring requirements of the IEP, as set forth in the IDEA. Barriers to implementation include, time constraints, lack of confidence and knowledge in using CBM, and doubt in the validity of some of the measures (Yell, et al., 1992; Foegen, 2001). Despite a very solid research base, CBM is not being used as originally intended and is not being used consistently and accurately by special education teachers to monitor student progress to meet the federal mandate (Estcheidt, 2006; Shinn, 2010). To update the literature and bridge the gap between the earlier studies on CBM and current practices and perceptions of elementary special education teachers a survey questionnaire was used to collect data from 84 elementary special education resource teachers from 15 public schools in the southeast. Results revealed that more special education teachers are using CBM than in the past. They are using CBM to fulfill the federal requirements of the IEP in regards to progress monitoring; however, many special education teachers are not using CBM as originally intended. Time and lack of confidence and knowledge in using some of the components of CBM are still barriers. The results, implications for special education leaders, and recommendations for future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0202.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a University of South Carolina. $b Special Education. $3 3186293
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-06A(E).
790 $a 0202
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10242604