東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Evaluating the effects of formal cor...

George, Kevin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluating the effects of formal corrective feedback on off-task/on-task behavior of mild intellectually disabled students: An action research study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluating the effects of formal corrective feedback on off-task/on-task behavior of mild intellectually disabled students: An action research study./
作者:	George, Kevin.
面頁冊數:	113 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-07A(E).
標題:	Education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10017632
ISBN:	9781339503516

Evaluating the effects of formal corrective feedback on off-task/on-task behavior of mild intellectually disabled students: An action research study.
George, Kevin.

Evaluating the effects of formal corrective feedback on off-task/on-task behavior of mild intellectually disabled students: An action research study. - 113 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.Ed.)--Capella University, 2016.

The off-task behavior demonstrated by the study participants appears to interfere with classroom instruction, contribute to poor academic performance and in many instances lead to disciplinary actions such as suspension. The purpose of the study entailed determining if formal corrective feedback has an effect on the off-task/on-task behavior of mild intellectually disabled students. Research questions were aimed at determining if formal corrective feedback effects the off-task behavior as well as whether it effects the on-task behavior of the study participants. A mixed research methodology was used to structure the study in order to ensure that a detailed picture be constructed of the small group of participants. The theories of constructivism, behaviorism were essential to the choice of treatment applied as well as to the method used to quantify behavior. The Direct Behavior Rating form (DBR) was used to rate the off-task/on-task behavior of each student and frequency behavior recordings of the various forms of off-task behavior demonstrated by each student was completed as well. The goal of the study looked to identify a potential strategy for addressing the behavioral deficiencies commonly displayed by students classified as mild intellectually disabled as well as any other student determined to have behavioral issues within the classroom setting. The study's results revealed that formal corrective feedback had a significant effect on the off-task/on-task behavior of students classified as being mild intellectually disabled. Additionally, it was found that formal corrective feedback had a relatively strong effect on all specific forms of off-task behaviors except "work refusal". A major implication of this study is that perhaps it would be best practice to focus on establishing and teaching an on-task behavior curriculum in addition to the academic curriculum already being taught to students classified as being mild intellectually disabled.

ISBN: 9781339503516Subjects--Topical Terms:

516579
Education.

Evaluating the effects of formal corrective feedback on off-task/on-task behavior of mild intellectually disabled students: An action research study.
LDR:02939nmm a2200289 4500 001 2115677
005 20170331102621.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339503516
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10017632
035 $a AAI10017632
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a George, Kevin. $3 3277347
245 1 0 $a Evaluating the effects of formal corrective feedback on off-task/on-task behavior of mild intellectually disabled students: An action research study.
300 $a 113 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Dana Forbes.
502 $a Thesis (D.Ed.)--Capella University, 2016.
520 $a The off-task behavior demonstrated by the study participants appears to interfere with classroom instruction, contribute to poor academic performance and in many instances lead to disciplinary actions such as suspension. The purpose of the study entailed determining if formal corrective feedback has an effect on the off-task/on-task behavior of mild intellectually disabled students. Research questions were aimed at determining if formal corrective feedback effects the off-task behavior as well as whether it effects the on-task behavior of the study participants. A mixed research methodology was used to structure the study in order to ensure that a detailed picture be constructed of the small group of participants. The theories of constructivism, behaviorism were essential to the choice of treatment applied as well as to the method used to quantify behavior. The Direct Behavior Rating form (DBR) was used to rate the off-task/on-task behavior of each student and frequency behavior recordings of the various forms of off-task behavior demonstrated by each student was completed as well. The goal of the study looked to identify a potential strategy for addressing the behavioral deficiencies commonly displayed by students classified as mild intellectually disabled as well as any other student determined to have behavioral issues within the classroom setting. The study's results revealed that formal corrective feedback had a significant effect on the off-task/on-task behavior of students classified as being mild intellectually disabled. Additionally, it was found that formal corrective feedback had a relatively strong effect on all specific forms of off-task behaviors except "work refusal". A major implication of this study is that perhaps it would be best practice to focus on establishing and teaching an on-task behavior curriculum in addition to the academic curriculum already being taught to students classified as being mild intellectually disabled.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0529
710 2 $a Capella University. $b Education. $3 2093659
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-07A(E).
790 $a 1351
791 $a D.Ed.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10017632