東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The paradox of green commodities.

McGee, Julius Alexander.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The paradox of green commodities.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The paradox of green commodities./
作者:	McGee, Julius Alexander.
面頁冊數:	130 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-01A(E).
標題:	Sociology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10142241
ISBN:	9781339975559

The paradox of green commodities.
McGee, Julius Alexander.

The paradox of green commodities. - 130 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2016.

In this dissertation, I establish a theoretical and empirical critique of modern forms of environmentally sustainable technology. Theoretically, I critique the application of environmentally sustainable technologies in modern capitalist economies using the treadmill of production theory and metabolic rift theory. I also expand on these theories by developing an analytical concept -- the displacement paradox. The displacement paradox refers to a counterintuitive phenomenon, where green technologies expand rather displace traditional production processes. Empirically, I assess the assumptions of the displacement paradox by analyzing the relationship between organic farming and agrochemical application, organic farming and greenhouse gas emissions, organic farming and water pollution, and alternatively fueled vehicles and total fuel consumption per vehicle. In each of these cases, I find that green technology (in the form of organic farming and alternatively fueled vehicles) is not displacing traditional production processes, and instead expanding alongside them. I argue that these findings are a result of the broader socioeconomic structure that green technology is produced under. Specifically, I contend that because current socioeconomic systems are established around traditional production processes, to substantially reduce environmental degradation, green technologies must operate as a social and technological counterforce to traditional production processes. Currently, the green technologies explored in this dissertation act as a technological alternatives to traditional production processes, making them commodities that sustain the current structure of social relations, as opposed to social and technological counterforces to environmentally hazardous forms of production. I conclude that in order for green technologies to successfully reduce environmental degradation, they must be established under social conditions that support their use over traditional production processes.

ISBN: 9781339975559Subjects--Topical Terms:

516174
Sociology.

The paradox of green commodities.
LDR:02942nmm a2200289 4500 001 2115117
005 20170212131634.5
008 180830s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339975559
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10142241
035 $a AAI10142241
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a McGee, Julius Alexander. $3 3276750
245 1 4 $a The paradox of green commodities.
300 $a 130 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Richard York.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2016.
520 $a In this dissertation, I establish a theoretical and empirical critique of modern forms of environmentally sustainable technology. Theoretically, I critique the application of environmentally sustainable technologies in modern capitalist economies using the treadmill of production theory and metabolic rift theory. I also expand on these theories by developing an analytical concept -- the displacement paradox. The displacement paradox refers to a counterintuitive phenomenon, where green technologies expand rather displace traditional production processes. Empirically, I assess the assumptions of the displacement paradox by analyzing the relationship between organic farming and agrochemical application, organic farming and greenhouse gas emissions, organic farming and water pollution, and alternatively fueled vehicles and total fuel consumption per vehicle. In each of these cases, I find that green technology (in the form of organic farming and alternatively fueled vehicles) is not displacing traditional production processes, and instead expanding alongside them. I argue that these findings are a result of the broader socioeconomic structure that green technology is produced under. Specifically, I contend that because current socioeconomic systems are established around traditional production processes, to substantially reduce environmental degradation, green technologies must operate as a social and technological counterforce to traditional production processes. Currently, the green technologies explored in this dissertation act as a technological alternatives to traditional production processes, making them commodities that sustain the current structure of social relations, as opposed to social and technological counterforces to environmentally hazardous forms of production. I conclude that in order for green technologies to successfully reduce environmental degradation, they must be established under social conditions that support their use over traditional production processes.
520 $a This dissertation contains previously published and unpublished co-authored material.
590 $a School code: 0171.
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0477
710 2 $a University of Oregon. $b Department of Sociology. $3 3276751
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-01A(E).
790 $a 0171
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10142241