東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Scientific peer review = guidelines ...

Starck, J. Matthias.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Scientific peer review = guidelines for informative peer review /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Scientific peer review/ by J. Matthias Starck.
其他題名:	guidelines for informative peer review /
作者:	Starck, J. Matthias.
出版者:	Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden : : 2017.,
面頁冊數:	ix, 59 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Academic writing. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9
ISBN:	9783658199159

Scientific peer review = guidelines for informative peer review /
Starck, J. Matthias.

Scientific peer reviewguidelines for informative peer review /[electronic resource] :by J. Matthias Starck. - Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :2017. - ix, 59 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - essentials,2197-6708. - essentials..

J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement. Contents Essence of Scientific Communication Why Peer Review? Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process Reviewer Recognition Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict Target Groups Advanced PhD students and postdocs from biomedical research and natural science fields who received their first peer review requests and now seek advice and guidance Researchers from all fields of science and all degrees of experience who wish to improve and develop their methodological approach to peer review The Author Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

ISBN: 9783658199159

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

529424
Academic writing.

LC Class. No.: P301.5.A27 / S73 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 808.02

Scientific peer review = guidelines for informative peer review /
LDR:02386nmm a2200313 a 4500 001 2110692
003 DE-He213
005 20180419110318.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 180619s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783658199159 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783658199142 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-658-19915-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a P301.5.A27 $b S73 2017
072 7 $a PSA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI086000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 808.02 $2 23
090 $a P301.5.A27 $b S795 2017
100 1 $a Starck, J. Matthias. $3 3264002
245 1 0 $a Scientific peer review $h [electronic resource] : $b guidelines for informative peer review / $c by J. Matthias Starck.
260 $a Wiesbaden : $b Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden : $b Imprint: Springer Spektrum, $c 2017.
300 $a ix, 59 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a essentials, $x 2197-6708
520 $a J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement. Contents Essence of Scientific Communication Why Peer Review? Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process Reviewer Recognition Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict Target Groups Advanced PhD students and postdocs from biomedical research and natural science fields who received their first peer review requests and now seek advice and guidance Researchers from all fields of science and all degrees of experience who wish to improve and develop their methodological approach to peer review The Author Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.
650 0 $a Academic writing. $3 529424
650 0 $a Technical writing. $3 551227
650 0 $a Peer review. $3 624199
650 0 $a Scholarly publishing. $3 569231
650 1 4 $a Life Sciences. $3 890838
650 2 4 $a Life Sciences, general. $3 890967
650 2 4 $a Popular Life Sciences. $3 2133169
650 2 4 $a Science Education. $3 895256
650 2 4 $a Coaching. $3 2182638
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a essentials. $3 3264003
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9
950 $a Biomedical and Life Sciences (Springer-11642)