東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Construction of a Dialog Influen...

Zavala, Julia.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Construction of a Dialog Influences Argumentive Writing and Epistemological Understanding.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Construction of a Dialog Influences Argumentive Writing and Epistemological Understanding./
作者:	Zavala, Julia.
面頁冊數:	99 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09A(E).
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10105402
ISBN:	9781339688732

How Construction of a Dialog Influences Argumentive Writing and Epistemological Understanding.
Zavala, Julia.

How Construction of a Dialog Influences Argumentive Writing and Epistemological Understanding. - 99 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.

Argumentive writing is not an easy skill to master. Students from middle school through college demonstrate weaknesses. In particular they fail to take a dialogic perspective, emphasizing their own position without considering addressing alternatives. Research has shown that engaging in dialog with peers is effective in enhancing students' argumentive thinking and writing. The present study examines whether college students (n=30) show similar benefits when asked to engage individually in a dialogic argumentive writing task. They were asked to construct a dialog between two people holding opposing positions on an issue. Students in a comparison group (n=30) were asked to write an essay on the same issue. Subsequently students in both groups were asked to write a brief TV script conveying their view.

ISBN: 9781339688732Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.

How Construction of a Dialog Influences Argumentive Writing and Epistemological Understanding.
LDR:03634nmm a2200361 4500 001 2079001
005 20161128143923.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339688732
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10105402
035 $a AAI10105402
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Zavala, Julia. $3 3194647
245 1 0 $a How Construction of a Dialog Influences Argumentive Writing and Epistemological Understanding.
300 $a 99 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Deanna Kuhn.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2016.
520 $a Argumentive writing is not an easy skill to master. Students from middle school through college demonstrate weaknesses. In particular they fail to take a dialogic perspective, emphasizing their own position without considering addressing alternatives. Research has shown that engaging in dialog with peers is effective in enhancing students' argumentive thinking and writing. The present study examines whether college students (n=30) show similar benefits when asked to engage individually in a dialogic argumentive writing task. They were asked to construct a dialog between two people holding opposing positions on an issue. Students in a comparison group (n=30) were asked to write an essay on the same issue. Subsequently students in both groups were asked to write a brief TV script conveying their view.
520 $a Differences in students' argumentive skills produced in the dialogs and essays were examined. Results showed that the dialog group more frequently included opponent-directed statements (sum of Critical single evaluation, Compare, Integrate other, and Integrate own/other) and integrative statements (sum of Integrate own, Integrate other, and Integrate own/other) in their writing, compared to the essay group. Differences in students' writing of their TV scripts were also examined. On this assessment, the effect of the dialog largely disappeared, with students in both the essay and dialog groups focusing largely on their own position.
520 $a Students' level of epistemological understanding was also examined -- that is, whether they regarded knowledge claims as largely facts (absolutist level), opinions (multiplist level), or judgments subject to scrutiny in a framework of alternatives and evidence (evaluativist level). Level of epistemological understanding was assessed immediately after the writing task to determine if constructing a dialog influenced students to take on a more evaluativist perspective in which the need for comparison of multiple perspectives is recognized. Students who had constructed a dialog were more often assessed to be at the multiplist or evaluativist levels of epistemological understanding (and never at the absolutist level), compared to students who had written an essay rather than constructed a dialog.
520 $a Although the benefit of the dialogic writing task largely did not generalize to the more self-focused TV script writing task, these findings indicate that promoting a dialogic perspective, even without engaging in dialog with an actual person, can be beneficial in supporting argumentive thinking and writing and mature epistemological understanding.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 516948
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Developmental Psychology. $3 3191247
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10105402