東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Social Contagion Effects in Intertem...

Bixter, Michael T.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Social Contagion Effects in Intertemporal Decision Making.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Social Contagion Effects in Intertemporal Decision Making./
Author:	Bixter, Michael T.
Description:	68 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-11B(E).
Subject:	Experimental psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3712114
ISBN:	9781321887174

Social Contagion Effects in Intertemporal Decision Making.
Bixter, Michael T.

Social Contagion Effects in Intertemporal Decision Making. - 68 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2015.

Intertemporal preferences refer to preferences for payoffs that occur at different times in the future. Though prior research has provided substantial information about the intertemporal preferences of individuals, little is known about group or collaborative intertemporal preferences. In the introduction of the current dissertation, we summarize two preliminary studies we carried out that began to investigate intertemporal decision making in a collaborative context. The three experiments included in the current dissertation follow this line of research and seek to gain a better understanding of the psychological and social processes involved in collaborative intertemporal decision making. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that group members believed to have less "expertise" were more influenced by the collaborative experience than members believed to have more "expertise". In Experiment 2, a dyadic experiment was carried out where participants either completed a matching judgment task or a binary choice task. Similar patterns of results were found in the two different task environments, which suggest a generality to the observed collaborative effects. Finally, in Experiment 3, greater control was exerted over the intertemporal preferences participants were exposed to. This was accomplished by merely exposing participants to the decisions believed to be made by another individual. By manipulating the decisions participants were exposed to, Experiment 3 tested the ability to intervene and causally shift intertemporal preferences in a predicted direction (i.e., towards more patience or more impatience).

ISBN: 9781321887174Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144733
Experimental psychology.

Social Contagion Effects in Intertemporal Decision Making.
LDR:02542nmm a2200289 4500 001 2076382
005 20161028121119.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321887174
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3712114
035 $a AAI3712114
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bixter, Michael T. $3 3191833
245 1 0 $a Social Contagion Effects in Intertemporal Decision Making.
300 $a 68 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Christian Luhmann; Suparna Rajaram.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2015.
520 $a Intertemporal preferences refer to preferences for payoffs that occur at different times in the future. Though prior research has provided substantial information about the intertemporal preferences of individuals, little is known about group or collaborative intertemporal preferences. In the introduction of the current dissertation, we summarize two preliminary studies we carried out that began to investigate intertemporal decision making in a collaborative context. The three experiments included in the current dissertation follow this line of research and seek to gain a better understanding of the psychological and social processes involved in collaborative intertemporal decision making. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that group members believed to have less "expertise" were more influenced by the collaborative experience than members believed to have more "expertise". In Experiment 2, a dyadic experiment was carried out where participants either completed a matching judgment task or a binary choice task. Similar patterns of results were found in the two different task environments, which suggest a generality to the observed collaborative effects. Finally, in Experiment 3, greater control was exerted over the intertemporal preferences participants were exposed to. This was accomplished by merely exposing participants to the decisions believed to be made by another individual. By manipulating the decisions participants were exposed to, Experiment 3 tested the ability to intervene and causally shift intertemporal preferences in a predicted direction (i.e., towards more patience or more impatience).
590 $a School code: 0771.
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a State University of New York at Stony Brook. $b Experimental Psychology. $3 1685378
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-11B(E).
790 $a 0771
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3712114