東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Phonological variation and L2 word l...

Yang, Chung-Lin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Phonological variation and L2 word learning: The role of orthography in word recognition and production.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Phonological variation and L2 word learning: The role of orthography in word recognition and production./
作者:	Yang, Chung-Lin.
面頁冊數:	238 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-11A(E).
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3716758
ISBN:	9781321959840

Phonological variation and L2 word learning: The role of orthography in word recognition and production.
Yang, Chung-Lin.

Phonological variation and L2 word learning: The role of orthography in word recognition and production. - 238 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2015.

Exposure to L2 orthography may help L2 learners distinguish a novel segmental (e.g., Escudero et al., 2008) and tonal contrast (Showalter & Hayes-Harb, 2013). However, little is known about whether learners can associate two phonetic variants with the same lexical entry when the orthographic form of the word is provided during learning. Thus, the goal of this dissertation is to investigate whether exposure to L2 orthography could help learners link two free variants with one lexical entry and whether Taiwanese and American participants will show different degrees of reliance on orthography in word learning. Four experiments were conducted in the current study. Experiment 1 examined whether orthography can help learners learn the [?-u] free variation in an artificial language using a word learning paradigm modified from Hayes-Harb, Nicol, and Barker (2010). No effect of orthography on the learning of vocalic free variation was found in Experiment 1, and both L1 groups showed low detection of the vowel alternations. A follow-up picture naming task investigating learners' encoding and decoding of the words was conducted in Experiment 2. The results from Experiment 2 showed that orthography did help learners score higher in picture naming and also produce more new forms of the free variants. Experiment 3 and 4 paralleled 1 and 2, respectively, but the target alternation was consonantal (i.e., [p-b] or [t-d] counterbalanced). An effect of orthography on the learning of [p-b] free variation (but not [t-d]) was found in Experiment 3. Compared to Experiment 1, only Americans showed better detection of the consonantal alternations but not Taiwanese. Experiment 4, a picture-naming task, was a follow-up of Experiment 3. It was found that, unlike in Experiment 2, orthography in this case did not always help learners score higher in production. In sum, mixed results regarding the effect of orthography on the learning of free variation were found. In general, the effect of orthography was stronger in production than in recognition. The findings reported in this dissertation add support to the role of orthographic information in lexical access.

ISBN: 9781321959840Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

Phonological variation and L2 word learning: The role of orthography in word recognition and production.
LDR:03083nmm a2200289 4500 001 2075630
005 20161024135718.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321959840
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3716758
035 $a AAI3716758
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yang, Chung-Lin. $3 3191030
245 1 0 $a Phonological variation and L2 word learning: The role of orthography in word recognition and production.
300 $a 238 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Isabelle Darcy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2015.
520 $a Exposure to L2 orthography may help L2 learners distinguish a novel segmental (e.g., Escudero et al., 2008) and tonal contrast (Showalter & Hayes-Harb, 2013). However, little is known about whether learners can associate two phonetic variants with the same lexical entry when the orthographic form of the word is provided during learning. Thus, the goal of this dissertation is to investigate whether exposure to L2 orthography could help learners link two free variants with one lexical entry and whether Taiwanese and American participants will show different degrees of reliance on orthography in word learning. Four experiments were conducted in the current study. Experiment 1 examined whether orthography can help learners learn the [?-u] free variation in an artificial language using a word learning paradigm modified from Hayes-Harb, Nicol, and Barker (2010). No effect of orthography on the learning of vocalic free variation was found in Experiment 1, and both L1 groups showed low detection of the vowel alternations. A follow-up picture naming task investigating learners' encoding and decoding of the words was conducted in Experiment 2. The results from Experiment 2 showed that orthography did help learners score higher in picture naming and also produce more new forms of the free variants. Experiment 3 and 4 paralleled 1 and 2, respectively, but the target alternation was consonantal (i.e., [p-b] or [t-d] counterbalanced). An effect of orthography on the learning of [p-b] free variation (but not [t-d]) was found in Experiment 3. Compared to Experiment 1, only Americans showed better detection of the consonantal alternations but not Taiwanese. Experiment 4, a picture-naming task, was a follow-up of Experiment 3. It was found that, unlike in Experiment 2, orthography in this case did not always help learners score higher in production. In sum, mixed results regarding the effect of orthography on the learning of free variation were found. In general, the effect of orthography was stronger in production than in recognition. The findings reported in this dissertation add support to the role of orthographic information in lexical access.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Linguistics. $3 1674911
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-11A(E).
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3716758