東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The effects of strategy instruction ...

Adler, Michelle Donn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effects of strategy instruction in reading informational text on reading level and motivation of fifth grade students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effects of strategy instruction in reading informational text on reading level and motivation of fifth grade students./
作者:	Adler, Michelle Donn.
面頁冊數:	127 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-06A(E).
標題:	Elementary education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3745365
ISBN:	9781339382326

The effects of strategy instruction in reading informational text on reading level and motivation of fifth grade students.
Adler, Michelle Donn.

The effects of strategy instruction in reading informational text on reading level and motivation of fifth grade students. - 127 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Liberty University, 2015.

The purpose of this nonequivalent control-group design study was to determine if students had an increase in reading level and motivation to read when more informational text and instruction was added into the curriculum. The independent variables were the reading curriculum, with Success for All (SFA) used with the control group and SFA with additional instruction in informational text used with the study group. The dependent variables were reading level and levels of motivation determined by the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) and the Elementary Reading Attitude Survey (ERAS) measured after eight weeks of instruction and again three months post-study. The research questions sought to determine if there was a two population case significance test of means difference in reading level and motivational gains between the group that received traditional reading instruction and the group that received additional instruction in reading informational text. The study also sought to determine if the academic reading and recreational reading gains differed between two instructional groups. Finally, the study also looked at immediate and three month post-study reading level gains. The sample included approximately sixty fifth graders from a mid-sized elementary school in the mid-west. Reading levels were measured with the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI), a quantitative assessment that is both valid and reliable, and attitude gains were measured with the Elementary Reading Attitude Survey (ERAS), also valid and reliable. After Levene's tests were run, ANCOVA was used to compare means. Results showed that students in the study group scored significantly higher on the academic, recreational, and total score of the ERAS post-study but did not score significantly better on the SRI, neither eight weeks post-study nor three months post-study.

ISBN: 9781339382326Subjects--Topical Terms:

641385
Elementary education.

The effects of strategy instruction in reading informational text on reading level and motivation of fifth grade students.
LDR:02813nmm a2200289 4500 001 2074977
005 20161008135110.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339382326
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3745365
035 $a AAI3745365
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Adler, Michelle Donn. $3 3190337
245 1 4 $a The effects of strategy instruction in reading informational text on reading level and motivation of fifth grade students.
300 $a 127 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Linda J. Holcomb; Scott Watson.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Liberty University, 2015.
520 $a The purpose of this nonequivalent control-group design study was to determine if students had an increase in reading level and motivation to read when more informational text and instruction was added into the curriculum. The independent variables were the reading curriculum, with Success for All (SFA) used with the control group and SFA with additional instruction in informational text used with the study group. The dependent variables were reading level and levels of motivation determined by the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) and the Elementary Reading Attitude Survey (ERAS) measured after eight weeks of instruction and again three months post-study. The research questions sought to determine if there was a two population case significance test of means difference in reading level and motivational gains between the group that received traditional reading instruction and the group that received additional instruction in reading informational text. The study also sought to determine if the academic reading and recreational reading gains differed between two instructional groups. Finally, the study also looked at immediate and three month post-study reading level gains. The sample included approximately sixty fifth graders from a mid-sized elementary school in the mid-west. Reading levels were measured with the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI), a quantitative assessment that is both valid and reliable, and attitude gains were measured with the Elementary Reading Attitude Survey (ERAS), also valid and reliable. After Levene's tests were run, ANCOVA was used to compare means. Results showed that students in the study group scored significantly higher on the academic, recreational, and total score of the ERAS post-study but did not score significantly better on the SRI, neither eight weeks post-study nor three months post-study.
590 $a School code: 1052.
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Liberty University. $b School of Education. $3 1017771
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-06A(E).
790 $a 1052
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3745365