東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Adaptation of Chinese graduate stude...

Jian, Hu.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Adaptation of Chinese graduate students to the academic integrity requirements of a U.S. university: A mixed methods research.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Adaptation of Chinese graduate students to the academic integrity requirements of a U.S. university: A mixed methods research./
作者:	Jian, Hu.
面頁冊數:	237 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-01A(E).
標題:	Educational leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3525904
ISBN:	9781267595478

Adaptation of Chinese graduate students to the academic integrity requirements of a U.S. university: A mixed methods research.
Jian, Hu.

Adaptation of Chinese graduate students to the academic integrity requirements of a U.S. university: A mixed methods research. - 237 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Clemson University, 2012.

The purpose of this mixed method study was to investigate how graduates originating from mainland China adapt to the U.S. academic integrity requirements. In the first, quantitative phase of the study, the research questions focused on understanding the state of academic integrity in China. This guiding question was divided into two sub-questions, academic misbehavior commonly practiced by students in China and factors leading to these types of misbehavior. The data were collected via a web-based survey (N=300) through convenience sampling. The results from the quantitative analysis displayed the commonly practiced academic misbehavior converge on four categories: a) cheating for benefits, b) plagiarism, c) exploiting academic resources, and d) falsifying one's work. Most factors appeared significant in leading to the misbehavior in the colleges in China. The quantitative analysis aimed to provide the contextual knowledge for the qualitative phase.

ISBN: 9781267595478Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.

Adaptation of Chinese graduate students to the academic integrity requirements of a U.S. university: A mixed methods research.
LDR:03446nmm a2200349 4500 001 2074114
005 20160927125345.5
008 170521s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267595478
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3525904
035 $a AAI3525904
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jian, Hu. $3 3189415
245 1 0 $a Adaptation of Chinese graduate students to the academic integrity requirements of a U.S. university: A mixed methods research.
300 $a 237 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Russell A. Marion.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Clemson University, 2012.
520 $a The purpose of this mixed method study was to investigate how graduates originating from mainland China adapt to the U.S. academic integrity requirements. In the first, quantitative phase of the study, the research questions focused on understanding the state of academic integrity in China. This guiding question was divided into two sub-questions, academic misbehavior commonly practiced by students in China and factors leading to these types of misbehavior. The data were collected via a web-based survey (N=300) through convenience sampling. The results from the quantitative analysis displayed the commonly practiced academic misbehavior converge on four categories: a) cheating for benefits, b) plagiarism, c) exploiting academic resources, and d) falsifying one's work. Most factors appeared significant in leading to the misbehavior in the colleges in China. The quantitative analysis aimed to provide the contextual knowledge for the qualitative phase.
520 $a The second, qualitative portion used grounded theory to code the data. Three big themes emerged out of the data: a) the Chinese academic worldview, b) the Chinese academic context, and c) how Chinese graduate students learn U.S. academic ethics. In further analysis, sub-themes emerged out of every theme. The Chinese academic worldview was divided into: a) the lack of a contractual binding, b) ethical issues not part of value system, c) the lack of reporting culture. The Chinese academic context was divided into: a) not taught about scholar ethics, b) poor supervision, and c) lack of a sanctioning mechanism. The theme of learning academic ethics in the U.S. was divided into: a) requirements of academic integrity in U.S., b) motives of Chinese graduate students to adapt to U.S. academic ethics, and c) learning U.S. academic ethics. Two assumptions were then partly supported by the research findings that China differs from the U.S. in terms of academic ethics and institutions in China are homogeneous regarding academic integrity requirements. A model was formulated based on research findings in the qualitative phase through one acculturation theory.
520 $a Finally, the implications for future research and practice were discussed. Several suggestions were presented to help relevant U.S. institutions of higher learning enhance the effectiveness of current programs in fostering Chinese graduate students' awareness of academic integrity.
590 $a School code: 0050.
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Educational sociology. $3 519608
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
650 4 $a Asian studies. $3 1571829
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0394
710 2 $a Clemson University. $b Education. $3 1022688
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-01A(E).
790 $a 0050
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3525904