東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Impact of Charter-based Judicial...

Richez, Emmanuelle.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Impact of Charter-based Judicial Review on Pan-Canadian Cultural Citizenship.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Impact of Charter-based Judicial Review on Pan-Canadian Cultural Citizenship./
作者:	Richez, Emmanuelle.
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-04A(E).
標題:	Public administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR79097
ISBN:	9780494790977

The Impact of Charter-based Judicial Review on Pan-Canadian Cultural Citizenship.
Richez, Emmanuelle.

The Impact of Charter-based Judicial Review on Pan-Canadian Cultural Citizenship. - 156 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2012.

This dissertation evaluates the impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) jurisprudence on Canada's cultural rights structure and cultural citizenship. In total, the dissertation analyzes 49 Supreme Court Charter decisions in the areas of minority language, multiculturalism and aboriginal issues, as well as their reception by governmental authorities. It argues that Charter-based judicial review has confirmed and pushed further the choice Canada made after the Second World War to promote a polyethnic citizenship. The dissertation also formulates three larger theoretical claims. First, that the recognition of specific cultural rights for certain groups that go beyond fundamental political and civil rights brings about positive legal change for minorities. This has especially been the case for the Anglophone minority inside Quebec and the Francophone minority outside Quebec, as well as for aboriginal communities across Canada. Secondly, that constitutionally entrenching rights and the transfer of power to the judiciary to invalidate laws that contravene those rights, is crucial for greater accommodation of diversity. As shown in the Canadian case, the Supreme Court's rulings in favour of minorities have been enforced by governmental authorities. Thirdly, that institutional nation-building objectives limit judicial review's potential for facilitating greater accommodation of diversity. The ideal of a polyethnic pan-Canadian citizenship prevents the recognition of new self-government rights for aboriginal peoples and Francophone Quebecers, even though there is interpretive space for such a constitutional reading.

ISBN: 9780494790977Subjects--Topical Terms:

531287
Public administration.

The Impact of Charter-based Judicial Review on Pan-Canadian Cultural Citizenship.
LDR:02565nmm a2200289 4500 001 2072706
005 20160816073113.5
008 170521s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494790977
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAINR79097
035 $a AAINR79097
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Richez, Emmanuelle. $3 3187912
245 1 4 $a The Impact of Charter-based Judicial Review on Pan-Canadian Cultural Citizenship.
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Christopher P. Manfredi.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--McGill University (Canada), 2012.
520 $a This dissertation evaluates the impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) jurisprudence on Canada's cultural rights structure and cultural citizenship. In total, the dissertation analyzes 49 Supreme Court Charter decisions in the areas of minority language, multiculturalism and aboriginal issues, as well as their reception by governmental authorities. It argues that Charter-based judicial review has confirmed and pushed further the choice Canada made after the Second World War to promote a polyethnic citizenship. The dissertation also formulates three larger theoretical claims. First, that the recognition of specific cultural rights for certain groups that go beyond fundamental political and civil rights brings about positive legal change for minorities. This has especially been the case for the Anglophone minority inside Quebec and the Francophone minority outside Quebec, as well as for aboriginal communities across Canada. Secondly, that constitutionally entrenching rights and the transfer of power to the judiciary to invalidate laws that contravene those rights, is crucial for greater accommodation of diversity. As shown in the Canadian case, the Supreme Court's rulings in favour of minorities have been enforced by governmental authorities. Thirdly, that institutional nation-building objectives limit judicial review's potential for facilitating greater accommodation of diversity. The ideal of a polyethnic pan-Canadian citizenship prevents the recognition of new self-government rights for aboriginal peoples and Francophone Quebecers, even though there is interpretive space for such a constitutional reading.
590 $a School code: 0781.
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Native American studies. $3 2122730
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0740
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $b Department of Political Science. $3 2105623
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-04A(E).
790 $a 0781
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR79097