東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Walking the talk? Examining the prac...

Bartock, Laura.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Walking the talk? Examining the practical application of models of science communication in long-term ecological research sites.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Walking the talk? Examining the practical application of models of science communication in long-term ecological research sites./
Author:	Bartock, Laura.
Description:	117 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-01(E).
Subject:	Communication. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1596127
ISBN:	9781321959963

Walking the talk? Examining the practical application of models of science communication in long-term ecological research sites.
Bartock, Laura.

Walking the talk? Examining the practical application of models of science communication in long-term ecological research sites. - 117 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2015.

Science communication research has developed theories about the way science communication operates in practice, but further investigation is needed to understand how well these models describe the practice of science communication on the ground. This thesis explores the relationship between theoretical models of science communication and the practice of science communication in long-term ecological research sites (LTERs). In particular, this exploratory study focuses on the deficit model, the dialogue model, and the participation model. I conducted semi-structured interviews to understand how science communication practitioners' views about their work relate to established models of science communication. In particular, I asked about how they view their roles and responsibilities, how they view their audience(s), and how they view ethical considerations of their work. Results suggested that the dialogue model was the most dominant model. The deficit and participation models also appeared, though less frequently. Many practitioners are aware of the shortcomings of deficit model approaches to science communication, but may not have the resources or experience necessary to engage in the intensive public engagement activities of participation model approaches.

ISBN: 9781321959963Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

Walking the talk? Examining the practical application of models of science communication in long-term ecological research sites.
LDR:02246nmm a2200289 4500 001 2072371
005 20160808080338.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321959963
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1596127
035 $a AAI1596127
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bartock, Laura. $3 3187548
245 1 0 $a Walking the talk? Examining the practical application of models of science communication in long-term ecological research sites.
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
500 $a Adviser: Laura N. Rickard.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2015.
520 $a Science communication research has developed theories about the way science communication operates in practice, but further investigation is needed to understand how well these models describe the practice of science communication on the ground. This thesis explores the relationship between theoretical models of science communication and the practice of science communication in long-term ecological research sites (LTERs). In particular, this exploratory study focuses on the deficit model, the dialogue model, and the participation model. I conducted semi-structured interviews to understand how science communication practitioners' views about their work relate to established models of science communication. In particular, I asked about how they view their roles and responsibilities, how they view their audience(s), and how they view ethical considerations of their work. Results suggested that the dialogue model was the most dominant model. The deficit and participation models also appeared, though less frequently. Many practitioners are aware of the shortcomings of deficit model approaches to science communication, but may not have the resources or experience necessary to engage in the intensive public engagement activities of participation model approaches.
590 $a School code: 0213.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 677245
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0768
710 2 $a State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. $b Environmental Science. $3 1029999
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-01(E).
790 $a 0213
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1596127