東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Writing (Dirty) New Media: Technorhe...

Hammer, Steven Reginald.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Writing (Dirty) New Media: Technorhetorical Opacity, Chimeras, and Dirty Ontology.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Writing (Dirty) New Media: Technorhetorical Opacity, Chimeras, and Dirty Ontology./
Author:	Hammer, Steven Reginald.
Description:	227 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-01A(E).
Subject:	Rhetoric. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3633105
ISBN:	9781321126839

Writing (Dirty) New Media: Technorhetorical Opacity, Chimeras, and Dirty Ontology.
Hammer, Steven Reginald.

Writing (Dirty) New Media: Technorhetorical Opacity, Chimeras, and Dirty Ontology. - 227 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Dakota State University, 2014.

There is little doubt that emerging technologies are changing the way we act, interact, create, and consume. Yet despite increased access to these technologies, consumers of technology too seldom interrogate the politics, subjectivities, and limitations of these technologies and their interfaces. Instead, many consumers approach emerging technologies as objective tools to be consumed, and engage in creative processes uncritically. This disquisition, following the work of Hawisher, Selfe, and Selfe, seeks ways to approach the problem of a "rhetoric of technology" that uncritically praises new technologies by drawing on avant-garde art traditions and object-oriented ontology. I argue that, by following the philosophies and practices of glitch, dirty new media, zaum, dada, circuit-bending, and others, we might approach writing technologies with the intention of critically misusing, manipulating, and revealing to ourselves and audiences the materiality of the media and technologies in use.

ISBN: 9781321126839Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Writing (Dirty) New Media: Technorhetorical Opacity, Chimeras, and Dirty Ontology.
LDR:02579nmm a2200289 4500 001 2071939
005 20160719071612.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321126839
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3633105
035 $a AAI3633105
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hammer, Steven Reginald. $3 3187120
245 1 0 $a Writing (Dirty) New Media: Technorhetorical Opacity, Chimeras, and Dirty Ontology.
300 $a 227 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew Mara.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Dakota State University, 2014.
520 $a There is little doubt that emerging technologies are changing the way we act, interact, create, and consume. Yet despite increased access to these technologies, consumers of technology too seldom interrogate the politics, subjectivities, and limitations of these technologies and their interfaces. Instead, many consumers approach emerging technologies as objective tools to be consumed, and engage in creative processes uncritically. This disquisition, following the work of Hawisher, Selfe, and Selfe, seeks ways to approach the problem of a "rhetoric of technology" that uncritically praises new technologies by drawing on avant-garde art traditions and object-oriented ontology. I argue that, by following the philosophies and practices of glitch, dirty new media, zaum, dada, circuit-bending, and others, we might approach writing technologies with the intention of critically misusing, manipulating, and revealing to ourselves and audiences the materiality of the media and technologies in use.
520 $a In combination with these avant-garde practices and philosophies, I draw from object-oriented ontology to argue that we, as new media composers, never simply write on or through our technologies, but that we write in collaboration with them, for they are active and agential coauthors even (and especially) despite their status as nonhuman. I argue for an model that not only levels the ontological playing field between humans and nonhumans, but also one that embraces irregularities and "glitches" as essential features of systems and the actors within those systems. Finally, I provide examples of how to perform these models and philosophies, which I call object-oriented art..
590 $a School code: 0157.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Art history. $3 2122701
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0377
710 2 $a North Dakota State University. $b English. $3 3187121
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-01A(E).
790 $a 0157
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3633105