東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Domestic Violence Practitioners' Use...

Malhotra, Krithika.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Domestic Violence Practitioners' Use of Research Evidence: Attitudes and Organizational Social Context.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Domestic Violence Practitioners' Use of Research Evidence: Attitudes and Organizational Social Context./
Author:	Malhotra, Krithika.
Description:	164 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-06B(E).
Subject:	Counseling Psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3746571
ISBN:	9781339400198

Domestic Violence Practitioners' Use of Research Evidence: Attitudes and Organizational Social Context.
Malhotra, Krithika.

Domestic Violence Practitioners' Use of Research Evidence: Attitudes and Organizational Social Context. - 164 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Miami, 2015.

Social services providers in the field of domestic violence (DV) are under increased pressure to have their clinical practices and programs be informed by research evidence. To date, however, it is unclear if DV practitioners are using research evidence in their work and little is known about the various attitudinal and organizational factors that may be associated with their use and ignoring of research. This study was conducted to help fill-in some of these knowledge gaps. A national sample of 206 DV practitioners (92% women, 64% white, mean age 42) completed the Practitioners Use of Research Survey, an online survey designed to understand DV practitioners' use of research evidence, attitudes toward research, and the perceived organizational climate and culture at their work sites. Consistent with our hypotheses, multiple hierarchical regression data analysis revealed attitudes toward research as a positive predictor of research use and a negative predictor of ignoring research. Unexpectedly, organizational culture was found to be a positive predictor for ignoring research and was not significantly related to research use. Contrary to our hypothesis, perceived organizational climate was unrelated to research use or ignoring research and climate and culture had no moderation effects. Implications of this study for organizations and recommendations for future research on understanding use and ignoring of research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781339400198Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122842
Counseling Psychology.

Domestic Violence Practitioners' Use of Research Evidence: Attitudes and Organizational Social Context.
LDR:02369nmm a2200289 4500 001 2071257
005 20160627142510.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339400198
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3746571
035 $a AAI3746571
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Malhotra, Krithika. $3 3186381
245 1 0 $a Domestic Violence Practitioners' Use of Research Evidence: Attitudes and Organizational Social Context.
300 $a 164 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Etiony Aldarondo.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Miami, 2015.
520 $a Social services providers in the field of domestic violence (DV) are under increased pressure to have their clinical practices and programs be informed by research evidence. To date, however, it is unclear if DV practitioners are using research evidence in their work and little is known about the various attitudinal and organizational factors that may be associated with their use and ignoring of research. This study was conducted to help fill-in some of these knowledge gaps. A national sample of 206 DV practitioners (92% women, 64% white, mean age 42) completed the Practitioners Use of Research Survey, an online survey designed to understand DV practitioners' use of research evidence, attitudes toward research, and the perceived organizational climate and culture at their work sites. Consistent with our hypotheses, multiple hierarchical regression data analysis revealed attitudes toward research as a positive predictor of research use and a negative predictor of ignoring research. Unexpectedly, organizational culture was found to be a positive predictor for ignoring research and was not significantly related to research use. Contrary to our hypothesis, perceived organizational climate was unrelated to research use or ignoring research and climate and culture had no moderation effects. Implications of this study for organizations and recommendations for future research on understanding use and ignoring of research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0125.
650 4 $a Counseling Psychology. $3 2122842
650 4 $a Social work. $3 644197
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
690 $a 0603
690 $a 0452
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a University of Miami. $b Psychology. $3 3186382
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-06B(E).
790 $a 0125
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3746571