東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Strategically planned versus rehears...

Wolf, James P.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Strategically planned versus rehearsed L2 narratives under different modality and input conditions.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Strategically planned versus rehearsed L2 narratives under different modality and input conditions./
Author:	Wolf, James P.
Description:	249 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-05A(E).
Subject:	English as a second language. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3745816
ISBN:	9781339388908

Strategically planned versus rehearsed L2 narratives under different modality and input conditions.
Wolf, James P.

Strategically planned versus rehearsed L2 narratives under different modality and input conditions. - 249 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Temple University, 2015.

In an attempt to investigate the impact of planning on second language (L2) oral production, an experimental study that contrasted the effects of two types of pre-task planning (strategic planning vs. rehearsal) on the L2 oral task performance of 64 Japanese university EFL learners under different modality (aural vs. written) and language (L1 vs. L2) conditions of pre-task input was conducted. The main aim was to determine whether strategic planning (i.e., silent preparation) and rehearsal (i.e., active practice) before L2 oral tasks differentially impact performance in terms of fluency, complexity, and accuracy. An additional aim was to examine the effects on performance of providing pre-task input to assist planning. Furthermore, I elicited the learners' perceptions of the value of the pre-task input toward assisting their oral task performance via 5-point Likert scale post-task questionnaires.

ISBN: 9781339388908Subjects--Topical Terms:

516208
English as a second language.

Strategically planned versus rehearsed L2 narratives under different modality and input conditions.
LDR:03134nmm a2200301 4500 001 2071046
005 20160628073004.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339388908
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3745816
035 $a AAI3745816
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wolf, James P. $3 3186146
245 1 0 $a Strategically planned versus rehearsed L2 narratives under different modality and input conditions.
300 $a 249 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: David Beglar.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Temple University, 2015.
520 $a In an attempt to investigate the impact of planning on second language (L2) oral production, an experimental study that contrasted the effects of two types of pre-task planning (strategic planning vs. rehearsal) on the L2 oral task performance of 64 Japanese university EFL learners under different modality (aural vs. written) and language (L1 vs. L2) conditions of pre-task input was conducted. The main aim was to determine whether strategic planning (i.e., silent preparation) and rehearsal (i.e., active practice) before L2 oral tasks differentially impact performance in terms of fluency, complexity, and accuracy. An additional aim was to examine the effects on performance of providing pre-task input to assist planning. Furthermore, I elicited the learners' perceptions of the value of the pre-task input toward assisting their oral task performance via 5-point Likert scale post-task questionnaires.
520 $a No difference was found between strategic planning and rehearsal in their effects on L2 oral task performance regarding fluency, complexity, or accuracy. This result suggests that, when it comes to pre-task planning, L2 teachers can generally have their learners engage in either strategic planning or rehearsal without differentially impacting their task performance. Concerning the provision of pre-task input, the L1 and L2 input induced commensurate levels of fluency and complexity. However, the L2 input led to significantly greater accuracy of oral production than did the L1 input. This finding is important as it suggests that L2 learners can possibly acquire something from the input provided to them in the course of pre-task planning. Moreover, the post-task questionnaire results corroborated this finding as the participants indicated that the L2 input significantly enhanced their accuracy and also helped them use a wider range of vocabulary during the tasks. Thus, if the aim of a teaching or testing situation is oriented toward fluency, the results indicate that it makes no difference whether pre-task input is in learners' L1 or L2. In contrast, if the aim is oriented toward accuracy, then teachers and testers should provide L2 input in order to facilitate optimal performance.
590 $a School code: 0225.
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Foreign language education. $3 3172512
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0444
690 $a 0279
710 2 $a Temple University. $b Language Arts. $3 3182860
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-05A(E).
790 $a 0225
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3745816