東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

English Negative Concord, Negative P...

Blanchette, Frances.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

English Negative Concord, Negative Polarity, and Double Negation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	English Negative Concord, Negative Polarity, and Double Negation./
作者:	Blanchette, Frances.
面頁冊數:	216 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-02A(E).
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3724446
ISBN:	9781339079561

English Negative Concord, Negative Polarity, and Double Negation.
Blanchette, Frances.

English Negative Concord, Negative Polarity, and Double Negation. - 216 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2015.

In Negative Concord (NC) sentences, single negative meanings are expressed by two or more negative words. English speakers that use NC also employ Double Negation (DN), where two negatives yield a logical affirmative. The same speakers also use Negative Polarity Item (NPI) constructions, where words like anything and anybody depend on a preceding negation (e.g. 'I didn't eat anything' vs. 'I ate anything'). This dissertation accounts for the distributions of NC, NPI, and DN constructions in English.

ISBN: 9781339079561Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.

English Negative Concord, Negative Polarity, and Double Negation.
LDR:03116nmm a2200313 4500 001 2070560
005 20160603135404.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339079561
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3724446
035 $a AAI3724446
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Blanchette, Frances. $3 3185616
245 1 0 $a English Negative Concord, Negative Polarity, and Double Negation.
300 $a 216 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Christina Tortora.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2015.
520 $a In Negative Concord (NC) sentences, single negative meanings are expressed by two or more negative words. English speakers that use NC also employ Double Negation (DN), where two negatives yield a logical affirmative. The same speakers also use Negative Polarity Item (NPI) constructions, where words like anything and anybody depend on a preceding negation (e.g. 'I didn't eat anything' vs. 'I ate anything'). This dissertation accounts for the distributions of NC, NPI, and DN constructions in English.
520 $a I apply the theory of NPIs in Postal (2005) and Collins and Postal (2014) to NC and DN. These authors argue that some NPIs have the form [NEG SOME X], with a single NEG, while others have two: [[NEG [NEG SOME]] X]. I propose that negative constituents have a structure identical to Collins and Postal's (2014) unary NEG NPIs. Like NPI constructions, NC with a negative marker ( -n't/not) and a negative object involves syntactic NEG raising from the negative constituent. I further propose that the locus of variation between NC and NPI constructions lies at the level of morphophonological spell out. NPI constructions involve deletion of lower occurrences of a single NEG, but NC does not. Using data from the Audio-Aligned and Parsed Corpus of Appalachian English (Tortora et al., In Progress), I show that all predictions concerning the distribution of NC, DN, and NPI constructions across clause boundaries are borne out.
520 $a Two types of NC with negative subjects are also analyzed. NC declaratives like 'didn't nobody eat' and 'nobody didn't eat' are derived via NEG raising from a negative constituent. In these cases, NEG raising is followed by remnant raising of the negative constituent. To explain restrictions on subject type in inverted structures ('didn't nobody eat'), I defend a condition stating that the subject must always be negative, despite the fact that it is not always morphologically negative. Differences in usage and interpretation of negative object and negative subject constructions are derived by appeal to a remnant raising condition. The results of a gradient acceptability study support the hypothesized grammatical distinction between Subject and Object NC.
590 $a School code: 0046.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0323
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b Linguistics. $3 1022754
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-02A(E).
790 $a 0046
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3724446