東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

What's in a Game's Name? Task Framin...

Brandon, Russell.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What's in a Game's Name? Task Framing, Learning, and Enjoyment in an Educational Game.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What's in a Game's Name? Task Framing, Learning, and Enjoyment in an Educational Game./
作者:	Brandon, Russell.
面頁冊數:	77 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-02(E).
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1543696
ISBN:	9781303312380

What's in a Game's Name? Task Framing, Learning, and Enjoyment in an Educational Game.
Brandon, Russell.

What's in a Game's Name? Task Framing, Learning, and Enjoyment in an Educational Game. - 77 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--Arizona State University, 2013.

This study explores the influence of framing and activity type on expectations of learning and enjoyment as well as performance in a paraphrase identification task. In the first experiment, 80 students played one of three activities framed as either a "play" or "learning" task. Students then completed one of three activities; learning only, an educational game, or a play only activity. Results showed that the play frame had an effect on learning expectations prior to completing the activity, but had no effect after completing the activity. Students who completed the educational game scored significantly higher on the posttest learning assessment than those in the play only activity. Pairwise comparisons also indicated that students who completed the educational game performed just as well as the learning only activity when given the posttest learning assessment. Performance in the paraphrase identification task was collected using data logged from student interactions, and it was established that although there was an interaction between performance and activity type, this interaction was due to a significant difference during the second round. These results suggest that framing can influence initial expectations, and educational games can teach a simple writing strategy without distracting from the educational task. A second experiment using 80 students was conducted to determine if a stronger frame would influence expectations and to replicate the effect of activity type on learning and enjoyment. The second study showed no effect of framing on expected or reported enjoyment and learning. The performance results showed a significant interaction between performance and activity type, with the interaction being driven by the first round that students completed. However, the effect of activity type was replicated, suggesting that game features can enhance student enjoyment and are not a detriment to learning simple strategy-based tasks.

ISBN: 9781303312380Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.

What's in a Game's Name? Task Framing, Learning, and Enjoyment in an Educational Game.
LDR:02871nmm a2200301 4500 001 2070141
005 20160531113944.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303312380
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1543696
035 $a AAI1543696
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Brandon, Russell. $3 3185170
245 1 0 $a What's in a Game's Name? Task Framing, Learning, and Enjoyment in an Educational Game.
300 $a 77 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02.
500 $a Adviser: Danielle S. McNamara.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Arizona State University, 2013.
520 $a This study explores the influence of framing and activity type on expectations of learning and enjoyment as well as performance in a paraphrase identification task. In the first experiment, 80 students played one of three activities framed as either a "play" or "learning" task. Students then completed one of three activities; learning only, an educational game, or a play only activity. Results showed that the play frame had an effect on learning expectations prior to completing the activity, but had no effect after completing the activity. Students who completed the educational game scored significantly higher on the posttest learning assessment than those in the play only activity. Pairwise comparisons also indicated that students who completed the educational game performed just as well as the learning only activity when given the posttest learning assessment. Performance in the paraphrase identification task was collected using data logged from student interactions, and it was established that although there was an interaction between performance and activity type, this interaction was due to a significant difference during the second round. These results suggest that framing can influence initial expectations, and educational games can teach a simple writing strategy without distracting from the educational task. A second experiment using 80 students was conducted to determine if a stronger frame would influence expectations and to replicate the effect of activity type on learning and enjoyment. The second study showed no effect of framing on expected or reported enjoyment and learning. The performance results showed a significant interaction between performance and activity type, with the interaction being driven by the first round that students completed. However, the effect of activity type was replicated, suggesting that game features can enhance student enjoyment and are not a detriment to learning simple strategy-based tasks.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 516948
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Psychology. $3 1677434
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-02(E).
790 $a 0010
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1543696