語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
How justification works.
~
Chapman, Andrew David.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
How justification works.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
How justification works./
作者:
Chapman, Andrew David.
面頁冊數:
289 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International77-01A(E).
標題:
Philosophy. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3721786
ISBN:
9781339035444
How justification works.
Chapman, Andrew David.
How justification works.
- 289 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2015.
Essential to our self-conception as rational human animals is that we are the makers and takers of reasons---we believe and act based on evidence. The project of determining exactly what this means for us is one of the central projects of philosophical epistemology. One dimension of this project that has been largely neglected, however, is how justification is supposed to play the specifically normative role that it's claimed to play. The project of this dissertation is to examine the specifically normative role of internalistic justification and to provide a positive theory for its nature and function.
ISBN: 9781339035444Subjects--Topical Terms:
516511
Philosophy.
How justification works.
LDR
:03002nmm a2200301 4500
001
2070087
005
20160602092058.5
008
170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781339035444
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3721786
035
$a
AAI3721786
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Chapman, Andrew David.
$3
3185115
245
1 0
$a
How justification works.
300
$a
289 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Robert A. Hanna.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado at Boulder, 2015.
520
$a
Essential to our self-conception as rational human animals is that we are the makers and takers of reasons---we believe and act based on evidence. The project of determining exactly what this means for us is one of the central projects of philosophical epistemology. One dimension of this project that has been largely neglected, however, is how justification is supposed to play the specifically normative role that it's claimed to play. The project of this dissertation is to examine the specifically normative role of internalistic justification and to provide a positive theory for its nature and function.
520
$a
When epistemologists claim that justification is normative, what they mean is that it is epistemically better, all things considered, to possess justification than to lack it. According to what I call the Standard Picture of Epistemic Normativity, the epistemic normativity of justification is to be explained in terms of justification's instrumental ability to bring about true beliefs. However, the Standard Picture, as I show, is fatally flawed and therefore cannot explain the epistemic value of justification. The question of how justification can play its properly normative role thus remains unanswered.
520
$a
This dissertation proceeds in four parts. In the first part, I lay out, explicate, and analyze the target concept of the dissertation: justification. In the second part, I show how the Standard Picture has been claimed to be able to explain the epistemic normativity of justification and how it has failed to do so. In the third part, I lay out a number of adequacy conditions on a theory of the epistemic normativity of justification---conditions any plausible theory would need to satisfy in order to satisfy its explanatory task. In the fourth part I present a two-part positive theory of the epistemic normativity of justification. This theory relies on philosophical tools developed by Kant, Husserl, and Heidegger and presents a picture of justification as grounded not in an instrumental ability to bring about true beliefs, but in the intrinsically valuable role it plays in our self-consciously social lives.
590
$a
School code: 0051.
650
4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
516511
650
4
$a
Epistemology.
$3
896969
690
$a
0422
690
$a
0393
710
2
$a
University of Colorado at Boulder.
$b
Philosophy.
$3
1028866
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
77-01A(E).
790
$a
0051
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2015
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3721786
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9302955
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入