東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Optimum acquisition and processing p...

Nwafor, Uchenna Chibuzo.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Optimum acquisition and processing parameters for multichannel analysis of surface waves using 3 D electrical resistivity tomography as control.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Optimum acquisition and processing parameters for multichannel analysis of surface waves using 3 D electrical resistivity tomography as control./
Author:	Nwafor, Uchenna Chibuzo.
Description:	144 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-01(E).
Subject:	Geophysical engineering. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1600704
ISBN:	9781339102146

Optimum acquisition and processing parameters for multichannel analysis of surface waves using 3 D electrical resistivity tomography as control.
Nwafor, Uchenna Chibuzo.

Optimum acquisition and processing parameters for multichannel analysis of surface waves using 3 D electrical resistivity tomography as control. - 144 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--Missouri University of Science and Technology, 2015.

Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) data were acquired in the Newburg, Missouri with the goal of determining optimum MASW acquisition parameters. Users of the MASW tool generally state that greater geophone intervals and greater shot-to-receiver offsets provide for more accurate results. The objective was to determine if this "rule of thumb" applies in karst terrain.

ISBN: 9781339102146Subjects--Topical Terms:

3175813
Geophysical engineering.

Optimum acquisition and processing parameters for multichannel analysis of surface waves using 3 D electrical resistivity tomography as control.
LDR:02831nmm a2200301 4500 001 2068968
005 20160507120445.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339102146
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1600704
035 $a AAI1600704
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Nwafor, Uchenna Chibuzo. $3 3183947
245 1 0 $a Optimum acquisition and processing parameters for multichannel analysis of surface waves using 3 D electrical resistivity tomography as control.
300 $a 144 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
500 $a Adviser: NEIL ANDERSON.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Missouri University of Science and Technology, 2015.
520 $a Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) data were acquired in the Newburg, Missouri with the goal of determining optimum MASW acquisition parameters. Users of the MASW tool generally state that greater geophone intervals and greater shot-to-receiver offsets provide for more accurate results. The objective was to determine if this "rule of thumb" applies in karst terrain.
520 $a ERT data were acquired along four traverses with eighty-four (84) electrodes at five feet spacing with SuperSting R8 Resistivity System using dipole- dipole array. The data were processed using Earth Imager to generate 2-D resistivity inversion and thereafter, Voxler software was used to collate the 2-D ERT data into a 3-D resistivity model. MASW data on the other hand, were acquired along the same ERT traverses on the same locations using a suite of different geophone intervals (1-ft, 2.5-ft, 5-ft, 7.5-ft, and 10-ft) and shot-to-receiver spacings (0-ft, 10-ft, 20-ft, 30-ft, 40-ft, and 50-ft) with a 20lb sledge hammer as the source. The data were processed using Surfseis software to generate the dispersion curves and 1-D shear wave velocity profiles of the area.
520 $a On the basis of the comparative analyses of the ERT and MASW data, it was determined that 2.5-ft and 5-ft geophone gave generated depth of bedrock that was consistent with ERT data. With 5-ft geophone spacing it is possible to image the subsurface to greater depth, but with the 7.5-ft and 10-ft, unidentifiable dispersion curves would be generated. Therefore, in this study area, on the basis of data that were acquired it is recommended that 2.5ft spacing be used if depth of investigation is about 40ft, but if the depth of investigation is about 80-ft, using a sledge hammer source then 5-ft geophone spacing at 20-ft shot-receiver offset distance is recommended.
590 $a School code: 0587.
650 4 $a Geophysical engineering. $3 3175813
650 4 $a Geological engineering. $3 2122713
690 $a 0467
690 $a 0466
710 2 $a Missouri University of Science and Technology. $b Geological Engineering. $3 3183948
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-01(E).
790 $a 0587
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1600704