Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Buddhist rituals of obeisance and th...
~
Reinders, Eric Robert.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Buddhist rituals of obeisance and the contestation of the monk's body in Medieval China.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Buddhist rituals of obeisance and the contestation of the monk's body in Medieval China./
Author:
Reinders, Eric Robert.
Description:
331 p.
Notes:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-07, Section: A, page: 2704.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International58-07A.
Subject:
Religious history. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9800484
ISBN:
9780591495355
Buddhist rituals of obeisance and the contestation of the monk's body in Medieval China.
Reinders, Eric Robert.
Buddhist rituals of obeisance and the contestation of the monk's body in Medieval China.
- 331 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-07, Section: A, page: 2704.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 1997.
In 662 C.E., the Chinese emperor Gaozong held an imperial debate on the question: should Buddhist monks and nuns be commanded to bow to their parents and to the emperor? Confucian imperial guest ritual required that all subjects bow to their ruler, and refusal to bow to parents was severely criticized as unfilial, but Chinese Buddhist monks had always claimed the right to abstain from bowing to any laity. This claim to exemption from orthodox social etiquette provoked conflict throughout the Medieval period. This dissertation first surveys this political history of bowing, the contours of Medieval anti-Buddhist polemics, and institutional strategies for constructing monastic and imperial bodies. The monks' claim to "disobeisance" was not, however, a rejection of the bow as a strategy of embodying hierarchical social distinctions, or as a method of spiritual cultivation. In fact, one of the most prominent lobbyists in the 662 debate was Daoxuan, the "founder" of the Chinese Vinaya (monastic discipline) lineage (Luzong). His treatise on monastic bowing: Shimen guijingyi (Buddhist Rites of Obeisance) contributes to the contextualization of the debate. Several groups of documents are analyzed: the legacy of debate on bowing, Daoxuan's writings on bowing, pro-bow and anti-bow speeches by high-ranking officials in the debate, letters from monks such as Daoxuan to members of the imperial house, and a general summation by the editor of the collection of these documents, Yanzong. There is almost nothing in Western scholarship about obeisance--and yet: the most common and pervasive Buddhist practice in Asia was and still is obeisance to Buddha. We are thus forced to find ways to imagine the bowing body as relevant to history, to social order, and to our categories of knowledge. The dissertation is a contribution to a theorization of the body as a relevant social and historical object or category, and presents a case study in the religious and political economy of embodiment.
ISBN: 9780591495355Subjects--Topical Terms:
2122824
Religious history.
Buddhist rituals of obeisance and the contestation of the monk's body in Medieval China.
LDR
:02927nmm a2200289 4500
001
2068161
005
20160422104809.5
008
170521s1997 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9780591495355
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI9800484
035
$a
AAI9800484
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Reinders, Eric Robert.
$3
756087
245
1 0
$a
Buddhist rituals of obeisance and the contestation of the monk's body in Medieval China.
300
$a
331 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-07, Section: A, page: 2704.
500
$a
Chair: William F. Powell.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 1997.
520
$a
In 662 C.E., the Chinese emperor Gaozong held an imperial debate on the question: should Buddhist monks and nuns be commanded to bow to their parents and to the emperor? Confucian imperial guest ritual required that all subjects bow to their ruler, and refusal to bow to parents was severely criticized as unfilial, but Chinese Buddhist monks had always claimed the right to abstain from bowing to any laity. This claim to exemption from orthodox social etiquette provoked conflict throughout the Medieval period. This dissertation first surveys this political history of bowing, the contours of Medieval anti-Buddhist polemics, and institutional strategies for constructing monastic and imperial bodies. The monks' claim to "disobeisance" was not, however, a rejection of the bow as a strategy of embodying hierarchical social distinctions, or as a method of spiritual cultivation. In fact, one of the most prominent lobbyists in the 662 debate was Daoxuan, the "founder" of the Chinese Vinaya (monastic discipline) lineage (Luzong). His treatise on monastic bowing: Shimen guijingyi (Buddhist Rites of Obeisance) contributes to the contextualization of the debate. Several groups of documents are analyzed: the legacy of debate on bowing, Daoxuan's writings on bowing, pro-bow and anti-bow speeches by high-ranking officials in the debate, letters from monks such as Daoxuan to members of the imperial house, and a general summation by the editor of the collection of these documents, Yanzong. There is almost nothing in Western scholarship about obeisance--and yet: the most common and pervasive Buddhist practice in Asia was and still is obeisance to Buddha. We are thus forced to find ways to imagine the bowing body as relevant to history, to social order, and to our categories of knowledge. The dissertation is a contribution to a theorization of the body as a relevant social and historical object or category, and presents a case study in the religious and political economy of embodiment.
590
$a
School code: 0035.
650
4
$a
Religious history.
$3
2122824
650
4
$a
Asian history.
$2
bicssc
$3
1099323
650
4
$a
Medieval history.
$3
3173905
690
$a
0320
690
$a
0332
690
$a
0581
710
2
$a
University of California, Santa Barbara.
$3
1017586
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
58-07A.
790
$a
0035
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
1997
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9800484
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9301029
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login