東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The impact of mindsets on literacy t...

Hyatt, Joanne C.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The impact of mindsets on literacy teaching in homeschooling environments: A chat analysis.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The impact of mindsets on literacy teaching in homeschooling environments: A chat analysis./
Author:	Hyatt, Joanne C.
Description:	246 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
Subject:	Educational technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3703004
ISBN:	9781321745856

The impact of mindsets on literacy teaching in homeschooling environments: A chat analysis.
Hyatt, Joanne C.

The impact of mindsets on literacy teaching in homeschooling environments: A chat analysis. - 246 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Temple University, 2015.

The gap between actual and expected use of technology in education prompted an exploration of my suspicions that human thoughts, feelings, and experiences with technology are central to the problem. While many internal factors influence teachers, this study explores the impact Lankshear and Knobel's mindsets have on teachers' decisions to implement digital technologies in education. Specifically I ask how mindsets about knowledge production and technology are mediators of, and mediated by, the activity of literacy teaching and learning in homeschooling environments. I reached over a hundred homeschooling parents through network sampling and a hundred parents submitted a survey designed to place them in one of four quadrants on a grid, assigning them a Mindset 1 rating and Mindset 2 rating. I randomly selected volunteers for each quadrant. I coded and analyzed nineteen interviews according the elements in the Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) heuristic and Lankshear and Knobel's mindsets. Findings indicate that mindsets do mediate technology use in literacy teaching; educators with high Mindset 1 (M1) ratings engage in more traditional educational methods, using technology for enhancing traditional literacy practices. Educators with high Mindset 2 (M2) ratings only implement technology for transformative practices if they also hold a low M1 rating. Regarding transformative use of technology (an M2 outcome), educational institutions must decide whether they want technology to transform instructional processes, literacy outcomes, or products or both.

ISBN: 9781321745856Subjects--Topical Terms:

517670
Educational technology.

The impact of mindsets on literacy teaching in homeschooling environments: A chat analysis.
LDR:02465nmm a2200277 4500 001 2067390
005 20160325105923.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321745856
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3703004
035 $a AAI3703004
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hyatt, Joanne C. $3 3182236
245 1 4 $a The impact of mindsets on literacy teaching in homeschooling environments: A chat analysis.
300 $a 246 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Michael W. Smith.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Temple University, 2015.
520 $a The gap between actual and expected use of technology in education prompted an exploration of my suspicions that human thoughts, feelings, and experiences with technology are central to the problem. While many internal factors influence teachers, this study explores the impact Lankshear and Knobel's mindsets have on teachers' decisions to implement digital technologies in education. Specifically I ask how mindsets about knowledge production and technology are mediators of, and mediated by, the activity of literacy teaching and learning in homeschooling environments. I reached over a hundred homeschooling parents through network sampling and a hundred parents submitted a survey designed to place them in one of four quadrants on a grid, assigning them a Mindset 1 rating and Mindset 2 rating. I randomly selected volunteers for each quadrant. I coded and analyzed nineteen interviews according the elements in the Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) heuristic and Lankshear and Knobel's mindsets. Findings indicate that mindsets do mediate technology use in literacy teaching; educators with high Mindset 1 (M1) ratings engage in more traditional educational methods, using technology for enhancing traditional literacy practices. Educators with high Mindset 2 (M2) ratings only implement technology for transformative practices if they also hold a low M1 rating. Regarding transformative use of technology (an M2 outcome), educational institutions must decide whether they want technology to transform instructional processes, literacy outcomes, or products or both.
590 $a School code: 0225.
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0279
710 2 $a Temple University. $b Teaching & Learning. $3 3181132
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0225
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3703004