東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Relationship between Emotional I...

Pallas, Edward.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Transformational Leadership Style, and Effectiveness among Police Supervisors.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Transformational Leadership Style, and Effectiveness among Police Supervisors./
作者:	Pallas, Edward.
面頁冊數:	138 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-04A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3738344
ISBN:	9781339286112

The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Transformational Leadership Style, and Effectiveness among Police Supervisors.
Pallas, Edward.

The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Transformational Leadership Style, and Effectiveness among Police Supervisors. - 138 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Wilmington University (Delaware), 2016.

Police leaders must often balance the conflicting values and needs of their organizational members and the communities they serve, in a constantly evolving and uncertain environment. This problem is exacerbated by the concept that ineffective leaders may tend to hold overly favorable views of themselves (Kruger & Dunning, 1999) and therefore may not comprehend the true level of their leadership abilities. The correlation between Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership were investigated in this quantitative study of police leaders. The final research sample was composed of 91 police leaders from three police departments in the United States. An emotional intelligence score for each police leader was obtained by administering the Emotional Quotient Inventory 2.0 (EQ-I 2.0). These leaders also completed the self-rater form of the Multi-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X). A mean transformational score along with leader effectiveness scores were then calculated for each leader. Each leader was also rated by followers, peers, and/or subordinates, at least three of whom completed the rater form of the MLQ 5X. The self-transformational and rater transformational scores were then compared to each other. The correlation between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership was positive, Pearson's r (91) = .57, p ≤ .05. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to assess if the independent variables (Transformational Leadership (TFL) - self-rating and EI) predicted the dependent variable (leader effectiveness as determined by the leadership outcome scores - Generates Extra Effort, Is Productive, and Generates Satisfaction). EI and TFL were able to account for 55% of the variance in Generates Extra Effort F(2, 87) = 54.00, p < .001, R2 = 0.55; 36% of the variance in Is Productive F(2, 87) = 24.37, p < .001, R 2 = 0.36; and 38% of the variance in Generates Satisfaction F(2, 87) = 26.79, p < .001, R 2 = 0.38. The relationship between self, peer, supervisor, and subordinate transformational leadership ratings was analyzed. The correlation between Transformational Leadership self-rating and Transformational Leadership Subordinate rating was positive, Pearson's r (91) = .40, p ≤ .017. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that future leadership training programs should be developed to educate police leaders on Emotional Intelligence and Transformational leadership behaviors.

ISBN: 9781339286112Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Transformational Leadership Style, and Effectiveness among Police Supervisors.
LDR:03419nmm a2200289 4500 001 2067067
005 20160321080129.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339286112
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3738344
035 $a AAI3738344
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Pallas, Edward. $3 3181923
245 1 4 $a The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Transformational Leadership Style, and Effectiveness among Police Supervisors.
300 $a 138 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Julie D. Lanzillo.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Wilmington University (Delaware), 2016.
520 $a Police leaders must often balance the conflicting values and needs of their organizational members and the communities they serve, in a constantly evolving and uncertain environment. This problem is exacerbated by the concept that ineffective leaders may tend to hold overly favorable views of themselves (Kruger & Dunning, 1999) and therefore may not comprehend the true level of their leadership abilities. The correlation between Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership were investigated in this quantitative study of police leaders. The final research sample was composed of 91 police leaders from three police departments in the United States. An emotional intelligence score for each police leader was obtained by administering the Emotional Quotient Inventory 2.0 (EQ-I 2.0). These leaders also completed the self-rater form of the Multi-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X). A mean transformational score along with leader effectiveness scores were then calculated for each leader. Each leader was also rated by followers, peers, and/or subordinates, at least three of whom completed the rater form of the MLQ 5X. The self-transformational and rater transformational scores were then compared to each other. The correlation between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership was positive, Pearson's r (91) = .57, p ≤ .05. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to assess if the independent variables (Transformational Leadership (TFL) - self-rating and EI) predicted the dependent variable (leader effectiveness as determined by the leadership outcome scores - Generates Extra Effort, Is Productive, and Generates Satisfaction). EI and TFL were able to account for 55% of the variance in Generates Extra Effort F(2, 87) = 54.00, p < .001, R2 = 0.55; 36% of the variance in Is Productive F(2, 87) = 24.37, p < .001, R 2 = 0.36; and 38% of the variance in Generates Satisfaction F(2, 87) = 26.79, p < .001, R 2 = 0.38. The relationship between self, peer, supervisor, and subordinate transformational leadership ratings was analyzed. The correlation between Transformational Leadership self-rating and Transformational Leadership Subordinate rating was positive, Pearson's r (91) = .40, p ≤ .017. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that future leadership training programs should be developed to educate police leaders on Emotional Intelligence and Transformational leadership behaviors.
590 $a School code: 1517.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0602
710 2 $a Wilmington University (Delaware). $b Education. $3 2094398
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-04A(E).
790 $a 1517
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3738344