東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Validity, Reliability, and Feasibili...

DePrenger, Molly McCoy.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of a Novel Screening Tool.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of a Novel Screening Tool./
作者:	DePrenger, Molly McCoy.
面頁冊數:	126 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-05(E).
標題:	Nutrition. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1526557
ISBN:	9781321863529

Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of a Novel Screening Tool.
DePrenger, Molly McCoy.

Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of a Novel Screening Tool. - 126 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--Rush University, 2015.

Many screening tools are available for use in hospitalized patients; however, no gold standard currently exists. The purpose of the study was to determine validity, reliability, and feasibility of a new tool, including functional status, oral intake, muscle wasting, and SIRS (FORMS). Adult patients admitted to general medical floors were included. Criterion validity was assessed using sensitivity and specificity between FORMS and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Differences in albumin and LOS were used to provide evidence for construct validity. A total of 213 patients were included; 94 at risk and 64 malnourished. Sensitivity and specificity of FORMS were 89.0% and 80.0% respectively. At risk patients (n=70) had a lower serum albumin (n=60) (3.2+/-0.6 vs. 3.6+/-0.6 mg/dL, p<0.001) and longer LOS than those not at risk (4 days (3,6) vs. 3 days (2,4), p=0.005). FORMS is a quick, valid, and reliable tool to screen adult hospitalized patients for nutrition risk.

ISBN: 9781321863529Subjects--Topical Terms:

517777
Nutrition.

Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of a Novel Screening Tool.
LDR:01801nmm a2200277 4500 001 2065224
005 20151130143826.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321863529
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1526557
035 $a AAI1526557
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a DePrenger, Molly McCoy. $3 3179905
245 1 0 $a Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of a Novel Screening Tool.
300 $a 126 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-05.
500 $a Adviser: Sarah Peterson.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Rush University, 2015.
520 $a Many screening tools are available for use in hospitalized patients; however, no gold standard currently exists. The purpose of the study was to determine validity, reliability, and feasibility of a new tool, including functional status, oral intake, muscle wasting, and SIRS (FORMS). Adult patients admitted to general medical floors were included. Criterion validity was assessed using sensitivity and specificity between FORMS and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Differences in albumin and LOS were used to provide evidence for construct validity. A total of 213 patients were included; 94 at risk and 64 malnourished. Sensitivity and specificity of FORMS were 89.0% and 80.0% respectively. At risk patients (n=70) had a lower serum albumin (n=60) (3.2+/-0.6 vs. 3.6+/-0.6 mg/dL, p<0.001) and longer LOS than those not at risk (4 days (3,6) vs. 3 days (2,4), p=0.005). FORMS is a quick, valid, and reliable tool to screen adult hospitalized patients for nutrition risk.
590 $a School code: 0821.
650 4 $a Nutrition. $3 517777
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
690 $a 0570
690 $a 0566
710 2 $a Rush University. $3 1261752
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-05(E).
790 $a 0821
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1526557