東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Response to intervention and reading...

Silverman, Debra E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Response to intervention and reading outcomes.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Response to intervention and reading outcomes./
作者:	Silverman, Debra E.
面頁冊數:	143 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-06A(E).
標題:	Educational leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3662310
ISBN:	9781321549461

Response to intervention and reading outcomes.
Silverman, Debra E.

Response to intervention and reading outcomes. - 143 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2014.

Schools today continue to intensify the need to find effective interventions for students who are at risk for reading failure. Many have turned to a multi-tiered Response to Intervention (Rtl) model to provide reading interventions that will assist educators in improving reading outcomes. This one-group pretest-posttest design study examined the relationship between participation in Rtl reading intervention and reading outcomes among 117 students grouped in a Tier 2 reading intervention. Using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Next reading assessment composite scores, I analyzed reading change for three benchmark time periods for the 2012-2013 school year. Results from descriptive statistics, t-test measures, and a multiple regression analysis produced positive results. The majority of students (95%) participating in a Tier 2 reading intervention demonstrated statistically significant growth in reading outcomes with a reading change mean of 95.93 points regardless of their gender, English learner status, or free and reduced-price lunch status. Improvement in reading outcomes occurred in all three designated time periods measured. This quantitative study indicates that the majority of students who participated in Rtl reading interventions improved reading outcomes from the beginning of the year to the end of the year and made gains in closing the achievement gap for reading.

ISBN: 9781321549461Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.

Response to intervention and reading outcomes.
LDR:02297nmm a2200289 4500 001 2064769
005 20151117142838.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321549461
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3662310
035 $a AAI3662310
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Silverman, Debra E. $3 3179393
245 1 0 $a Response to intervention and reading outcomes.
300 $a 143 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Louise Adler.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--California State University, Fullerton, 2014.
520 $a Schools today continue to intensify the need to find effective interventions for students who are at risk for reading failure. Many have turned to a multi-tiered Response to Intervention (Rtl) model to provide reading interventions that will assist educators in improving reading outcomes. This one-group pretest-posttest design study examined the relationship between participation in Rtl reading intervention and reading outcomes among 117 students grouped in a Tier 2 reading intervention. Using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Next reading assessment composite scores, I analyzed reading change for three benchmark time periods for the 2012-2013 school year. Results from descriptive statistics, t-test measures, and a multiple regression analysis produced positive results. The majority of students (95%) participating in a Tier 2 reading intervention demonstrated statistically significant growth in reading outcomes with a reading change mean of 95.93 points regardless of their gender, English learner status, or free and reduced-price lunch status. Improvement in reading outcomes occurred in all three designated time periods measured. This quantitative study indicates that the majority of students who participated in Rtl reading interventions improved reading outcomes from the beginning of the year to the end of the year and made gains in closing the achievement gap for reading.
590 $a School code: 6060.
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0524
710 2 $a California State University, Fullerton. $3 1017845
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-06A(E).
790 $a 6060
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3662310