東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Assessing the quality of feedback du...

Onello, Rachel.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Assessing the quality of feedback during clinical learning: Development of the Feedback Assessment for Clinical Education (FACE).

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Assessing the quality of feedback during clinical learning: Development of the Feedback Assessment for Clinical Education (FACE)./
Author:	Onello, Rachel.
Description:	187 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-10B(E).
Subject:	Nursing. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3704607
ISBN:	9781321771466

Assessing the quality of feedback during clinical learning: Development of the Feedback Assessment for Clinical Education (FACE).
Onello, Rachel.

Assessing the quality of feedback during clinical learning: Development of the Feedback Assessment for Clinical Education (FACE). - 187 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Background: During a time of increased faculty shortages, nursing programs rely heavily on adjunct instructors to facilitate clinical learning experiences essential for fostering clinical reasoning and multiple ways of thinking. A significant component of clinical learning is the reflective feedback conversation that occurs between instructor and student. Quality feedback conversations use specific techniques that explicitly encourage students to reflect, analyze, and extrapolate learning to other contexts. Comparing actual performance to desired performance through the exploration and analysis of learner thoughts and actions is an effective modality to help close learning gaps and impact future performance. However, many clinical instructors responsible for facilitating feedback conversations are inadequately prepared to do so, lacking the pedagogical training necessary to maximize learning. Current resources for clinical instructors fail to provide a clear framework that guides instructors on how to facilitate feedback conversations for quality learning.

ISBN: 9781321771466Subjects--Topical Terms:

528444
Nursing.

Assessing the quality of feedback during clinical learning: Development of the Feedback Assessment for Clinical Education (FACE).
LDR:03803nmm a2200361 4500 001 2063166
005 20151027095358.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321771466
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3704607
035 $a AAI3704607
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Onello, Rachel. $3 3177653
245 1 0 $a Assessing the quality of feedback during clinical learning: Development of the Feedback Assessment for Clinical Education (FACE).
300 $a 187 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Mary J. Regan; Meg Johantgen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a Background: During a time of increased faculty shortages, nursing programs rely heavily on adjunct instructors to facilitate clinical learning experiences essential for fostering clinical reasoning and multiple ways of thinking. A significant component of clinical learning is the reflective feedback conversation that occurs between instructor and student. Quality feedback conversations use specific techniques that explicitly encourage students to reflect, analyze, and extrapolate learning to other contexts. Comparing actual performance to desired performance through the exploration and analysis of learner thoughts and actions is an effective modality to help close learning gaps and impact future performance. However, many clinical instructors responsible for facilitating feedback conversations are inadequately prepared to do so, lacking the pedagogical training necessary to maximize learning. Current resources for clinical instructors fail to provide a clear framework that guides instructors on how to facilitate feedback conversations for quality learning.
520 $a Methods: To address the need for a tool that can guide the development of feedback skills and assess feedback behaviors among clinical instructors, The Feedback Assessment for Clinical Education (FACE) was developed. The FACE was designed to assess instructor behaviors associated with facilitating quality feedback conversations across clinical settings and disciplines. Using a multiphase approach, the FACE tool, comprising a rating form and rater handbook, was developed using Mezirow's Transformative Learning Theory, multidisciplinary research, and experts from the fields of education, organizational behavior, psychology, and health sciences. An iterative comparative process using theory and research guided the identification and development of key constructs associated with effective feedback conversations.
520 $a Results: Qualitative content validity testing informed the operationalization of constructs into behavioral indicators and resulted in a six element behaviorally anchored rating scale. Quantitative content validity testing using Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio and the Content Validity Index suggest strong content validity at each level of the tool.
520 $a Conclusions: This work offers a theory-based, research-driven tool to assess the quality of feedback in clinical settings and presents opportunities across education, research, and practice to enhance the current state of knowledge on best practices of feedback conversations. Future psychometric testing is needed to fully appreciate the potential of the FACE tool.
590 $a School code: 0373.
650 4 $a Nursing. $3 528444
650 4 $a School counseling. $3 2144793
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
690 $a 0569
690 $a 0519
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0622
710 2 $a University of Maryland, Baltimore. $b Nursing. $3 1035373
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-10B(E).
790 $a 0373
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3704607