東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Learning to argue in a connected wor...

Teske, Paul Robert-John.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Learning to argue in a connected world: The arc of productive disciplinary engagement in a high school academic social network.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Learning to argue in a connected world: The arc of productive disciplinary engagement in a high school academic social network./
作者:	Teske, Paul Robert-John.
面頁冊數:	170 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-08A(E).
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3618350
ISBN:	9781303865985

Learning to argue in a connected world: The arc of productive disciplinary engagement in a high school academic social network.
Teske, Paul Robert-John.

Learning to argue in a connected world: The arc of productive disciplinary engagement in a high school academic social network. - 170 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Calls to virtually break down school walls through connected and blended learning environments are ubiquitous as of late as technologies in service of learning evolve and as schools are under pressure to change. Within the subject area of English Language Arts, there is a dearth of research or information on how to facilitate these new, digitally enhanced methods in high schools in a way that approaches or leads to productive disciplinary engagement (PDE). The current study describes one such scenario in which an academic social network (Remix) was used for the retrieval of curriculum, the storage of student work, and the exchange for both social and academic conversations with an entire freshman class of high school students across three teachers and eight classrooms. The seven-week curriculum focused on learning to read, analyze, and write evidence-based, classical arguments. Experts in argumentation (e.g., lawyers, journalists, grant writers, ex-English teachers, etc.) interacted with the students three times during the arc of the unit to give targeted feedback to students during their growing understanding of argumentation. To determine the degree to which PDE occurred within the platform, the posts of twenty-five randomly selected students, who had at least one interaction with an expert, were downloaded and coded for Social and Cognitive Presence--two domains of the Community of Inquiry Model. The analysis illustrated that Social Presence acted as connective tissue to academic tasks and that socializing moved to an academic orientation as students collaborated and worked toward a common goal. Cognitive Presence also moved from trigger events which included recognizing and puzzling over contemporary issues to the exploration and integration of ideas as the unit progressed. The discourses associated with academic social networks proved slightly troublesome for students, lending credence that they need more practice in such platforms when posting and responding to academic content. A second investigation was completed to look more specifically at expert feedback in relation to PDE components, argumentation, and curricular activity. Differences between the three feedback interactions proved scientifically significant, thus illustrating experts adjusted their responses to students depending on the task. Experts moved from problematizing student arguments at the trigger stage of topic selection to directing students as to how to fix their arguments during the integration stage of production, thus holding students accountable to disciplinary norms as the unit progressed. Advice for how to utilize a social network and work with outside experts is also covered.

ISBN: 9781303865985Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.

Learning to argue in a connected world: The arc of productive disciplinary engagement in a high school academic social network.
LDR:03805nmm a2200313 4500 001 2062588
005 20151027073512.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303865985
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3618350
035 $a AAI3618350
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Teske, Paul Robert-John. $3 3176980
245 1 0 $a Learning to argue in a connected world: The arc of productive disciplinary engagement in a high school academic social network.
300 $a 170 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Deborah McCutchen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a Calls to virtually break down school walls through connected and blended learning environments are ubiquitous as of late as technologies in service of learning evolve and as schools are under pressure to change. Within the subject area of English Language Arts, there is a dearth of research or information on how to facilitate these new, digitally enhanced methods in high schools in a way that approaches or leads to productive disciplinary engagement (PDE). The current study describes one such scenario in which an academic social network (Remix) was used for the retrieval of curriculum, the storage of student work, and the exchange for both social and academic conversations with an entire freshman class of high school students across three teachers and eight classrooms. The seven-week curriculum focused on learning to read, analyze, and write evidence-based, classical arguments. Experts in argumentation (e.g., lawyers, journalists, grant writers, ex-English teachers, etc.) interacted with the students three times during the arc of the unit to give targeted feedback to students during their growing understanding of argumentation. To determine the degree to which PDE occurred within the platform, the posts of twenty-five randomly selected students, who had at least one interaction with an expert, were downloaded and coded for Social and Cognitive Presence--two domains of the Community of Inquiry Model. The analysis illustrated that Social Presence acted as connective tissue to academic tasks and that socializing moved to an academic orientation as students collaborated and worked toward a common goal. Cognitive Presence also moved from trigger events which included recognizing and puzzling over contemporary issues to the exploration and integration of ideas as the unit progressed. The discourses associated with academic social networks proved slightly troublesome for students, lending credence that they need more practice in such platforms when posting and responding to academic content. A second investigation was completed to look more specifically at expert feedback in relation to PDE components, argumentation, and curricular activity. Differences between the three feedback interactions proved scientifically significant, thus illustrating experts adjusted their responses to students depending on the task. Experts moved from problematizing student arguments at the trigger stage of topic selection to directing students as to how to fix their arguments during the integration stage of production, thus holding students accountable to disciplinary norms as the unit progressed. Advice for how to utilize a social network and work with outside experts is also covered.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0447
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Education - Seattle. $3 2049919
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-08A(E).
790 $a 0250
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3618350